Bitcoin Gold hit by 51% attacks, $72K in cryptocurrency ...

Putting $400M of Bitcoin on your company balance sheet

Also posted on my blog as usual. Read it there if you can, there are footnotes and inlined plots.
A couple of months ago, MicroStrategy (MSTR) had a spare $400M of cash which it decided to shift to Bitcoin (BTC).
Today we'll discuss in excrutiating detail why this is not a good idea.
When a company has a pile of spare money it doesn't know what to do with, it'll normally do buybacks or start paying dividends. That gives the money back to the shareholders, and from an economic perspective the money can get better invested in other more promising companies. If you have a huge pile of of cash, you probably should be doing other things than leave it in a bank account to gather dust.
However, this statement from MicroStrategy CEO Michael Saylor exists to make it clear he's buying into BTC for all the wrong reasons:
“This is not a speculation, nor is it a hedge. This was a deliberate corporate strategy to adopt a bitcoin standard.”
Let's unpack it and jump into the economics Bitcoin:

Is Bitcoin money?

No.
Or rather BTC doesn't act as money and there's no serious future path for BTC to become a form of money. Let's go back to basics. There are 3 main economic problems money solves:
1. Medium of Exchange. Before money we had to barter, which led to the double coincidence of wants problem. When everyone accepts the same money you can buy something from someone even if they don't like the stuff you own.
As a medium of exchange, BTC is not good. There are significant transaction fees and transaction waiting times built-in to BTC and these worsen the more popular BTC get.
You can test BTC's usefulness as a medium of exchange for yourself right now: try to order a pizza or to buy a random item with BTC. How many additional hurdles do you have to go through? How many fewer options do you have than if you used a regular currency? How much overhead (time, fees) is there?
2. Unit of Account. A unit of account is what you compare the value of objects against. We denominate BTC in terms of how many USD they're worth, so BTC is a unit of account presently. We can say it's because of lack of adoption, but really it's also because the market value of BTC is so volatile.
If I buy a $1000 table today or in 2017, it's roughly a $1000 table. We can't say that a 0.4BTC table was a 0.4BTC table in 2017. We'll expand on this in the next point:
3. Store of Value. When you create economic value, you don't want to be forced to use up the value you created right away.
For instance, if I fix your washing machine and you pay me in avocados, I'd be annoyed. I'd have to consume my payment before it becomes brown, squishy and disgusting. Avocado fruit is not good money because avocadoes loses value very fast.
On the other hand, well-run currencies like the USD, GBP, CAD, EUR, etc. all lose their value at a low and most importantly fairly predictible rate. Let's look at the chart of the USD against BTC
While the dollar loses value at a predictible rate, BTC is all over the place, which is bad.
One important use money is to write loan contracts. Loans are great. They let people spend now against their future potential earnings, so they can buy houses or start businesses without first saving up for a decade. Loans are good for the economy.
If you want to sign something that says "I owe you this much for that much time" then you need to be able to roughly predict the value of the debt in at the point in time where it's due.
Otherwise you'll have a hard time pricing the risk of the loan effectively. This means that you need to charge higher interests. The risk of making a loan in BTC needs to be priced into the interest of a BTC-denominated loan, which means much higher interest rates. High interests on loans are bad, because buying houses and starting businesses are good things.

BTC has a fixed supply, so these problems are built in

Some people think that going back to a standard where our money was denominated by a stock of gold (the Gold Standard) would solve economic problems. This is nonsense.
Having control over supply of your currency is a good thing, as long as it's well run.
See here
Remember that what is desirable is low variance in the value, not the value itself. When there are wild fluctuations in value, it's hard for money to do its job well.
Since the 1970s, the USD has been a fiat money with no intrinsic value. This means we control the supply of money.
Let's look at a classic poorly drawn econ101 graph
The market price for USD is where supply meets demand. The problem with a currency based on an item whose supply is fixed is that the price will necessarily fluctuate in response to changes in demand.
Imagine, if you will, that a pandemic strikes and that the demand for currency takes a sharp drop. The US imports less, people don't buy anything anymore, etc. If you can't print money, you get deflation, which is worsens everything. On the other hand, if you can make the money printers go brrrr you can stabilize the price
Having your currency be based on a fixed supply isn't just bad because in/deflation is hard to control.
It's also a national security risk...
The story of the guy who crashed gold prices in North Africa
In the 1200s, Mansa Munsa, the emperor of the Mali, was rich and a devout Muslim and wanted everyone to know it. So he embarked on a pilgrimage to make it rain all the way to Mecca.
He in fact made it rain so hard he increased the overall supply of gold and unintentionally crashed gold prices in Cairo by 20%, wreaking an economic havoc in North Africa that lasted a decade.
This story is fun, the larger point that having your inflation be at the mercy of foreign nations is an undesirable attribute in any currency. The US likes to call some countries currency manipulators, but this problem would be serious under a gold standard.

Currencies are based on trust

Since the USD is based on nothing except the US government's word, how can we trust USD not to be mismanaged?
The answer is that you can probably trust the fed until political stooges get put in place. Currently, the US's central bank managing the USD, the Federal Reserve (the Fed for friends & family), has administrative authority. The fed can say "no" to dumb requests from the president.
People who have no idea what the fed does like to chant "audit the fed", but the fed is already one of the best audited US federal entities. The transcripts of all their meetings are out in the open. As is their balance sheet, what they plan to do and why. If the US should audit anything it's the Department of Defense which operates without any accounting at all.
It's easy to see when a central bank will go rogue: it's when political yes-men are elected to the board.
For example, before printing themselves into hyperinflation, the Venezuelan president appointed a sociologist who publicly stated “Inflation does not exist in real life” and instead is a made up capitalist lie. Note what happened mere months after his gaining control over the Venezuelan currency
This is a key policy. One paper I really like, Sargent (1984) "The end of 4 big inflations" states:
The essential measures that ended hyperinflation in each of Germany,Austria, Hungary, and Poland were, first, the creation of an independentcentral bank that was legally committed to refuse the government'sdemand or additional unsecured credit and, second, a simultaneousalteration in the fiscal policy regime.
In english: *hyperinflation stops when the central bank can say "no" to the government."
The US Fed, like other well good central banks, is run by a bunch of nerds. When it prints money, even as aggressively as it has it does so for good reasons. You can see why they started printing on March 15th as the COVID lockdowns started:
The Federal Reserve is prepared to use its full range of tools to support the flow of credit to households and businesses and thereby promote its maximum employment and price stability goals.
In english: We're going to keep printing and lowering rates until jobs are back and inflation is under control. If we print until the sun is blotted out, we'll print in the shade.

BTC is not gold

Gold is a good asset for doomsday-preppers. If society crashes, gold will still have value.
How do we know that?
Gold has held value throughout multiple historic catastrophes over thousands of years. It had value before and after the Bronze Age Collapse, the Fall of the Western Roman Empire and Gengis Khan being Gengis Khan.
Even if you erased humanity and started over, the new humans would still find gold to be economically valuable. When Europeans d̶i̶s̶c̶o̶v̶e̶r̶e̶d̶ c̶o̶n̶q̶u̶e̶r̶e̶d̶ g̶e̶n̶o̶c̶i̶d̶e̶d̶ went to America, they found gold to be an important item over there too. This is about equivalent to finding humans on Alpha-Centauri and learning that they think gold is a good store of value as well.
Some people are puzzled at this: we don't even use gold for much! But it has great properties:
First, gold is hard to fake and impossible to manufacture. This makes it good to ascertain payment.
Second, gold doesnt react to oxygen, so it doesn't rust or tarnish. So it keeps value over time unlike most other materials.
Last, gold is pretty. This might sound frivolous, and you may not like it, but jewelry has actual value to humans.
It's no coincidence if you look at a list of the wealthiest families, a large number of them trade in luxury goods.
To paraphrase Veblen humans have a profound desire to signal social status, for the same reason peacocks have unwieldy tails. Gold is a great way to achieve that.
On the other hand, BTC lacks all these attributes. Its value is largely based on common perception of value. There are a few fundamental drivers of demand:
Apart from these, it's hard to argue that BTC will retain value throughout some sort of economic catastrophe.

BTC is really risky

One last statement from Michael Saylor I take offense to is this:
“We feel pretty confident that Bitcoin is less risky than holding cash, less risky than holding gold,” MicroStrategy CEO said in an interview
"BTC is less risky than holding cash or gold long term" is nonsense. We saw before that BTC is more volatile on face value, and that as long as the Fed isn't run by spider monkeys stacked in a trench coat, the inflation is likely to be within reasonable bounds.
But on top of this, BTC has Abrupt downside risks that normal currencies don't. Let's imagine a few:

Blockchain solutions are fundamentally inefficient

Blockchain was a genius idea. I still marvel at the initial white paper which is a great mix of economics and computer science.
That said, blockchain solutions make large tradeoffs in design because they assume almost no trust between parties. This leads to intentionally wasteful designs on a massive scale.
The main problem is that all transactions have to be validated by expensive computational operations and double checked by multiple parties. This means waste:
Many design problems can be mitigated by various improvements over BTC, but it remains that a simple database always works better than a blockchain if you can trust the parties to the transaction.
submitted by VodkaHaze to badeconomics [link] [comments]

morning joe

Stocks are set to end the week on a high note after four of the biggest tech stocks - Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN), Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) and Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL) - reported quarterly results that beat high expectations. Apple easily exceeded estimates on the top and bottom lines, and announced a four-for-one stock split, sending shares past the $400 threshold in after-hours trading. Amazon's sales soared, and operating income nearly doubled compared with the big drop analysts had expected. Facebook posted 11% revenue growth and issued stronger-than-expected sales guidance for the current quarter. Results from Google's parent were a bit murkier, showing the company's first-ever year-over-year decline in advertising revenue, but sales from its cloud-computing segment came in well above expectations. Big Tech has been Wall Street's mainstay this year, and the latest quarterly results look to accelerate that trend. Amazon and Apple are up 65% and 31%, respectively, in 2020, while Facebook and Alphabet each have gained more than 14% over the period. With all four stocks moving higher in after-hours trading, the tech titans likely will add more than $200 billion to their combined market value.
U.S. economy shrank by a third in Q2
The Commerce Department said U.S. gross domestic product collapsed at a 32.9% annualized rate in the second quarter, the steepest decline since the government started keeping records in 1947, as COVID-19 crushed consumer and business spending. Meanwhile, in a sign of a faltering jobs market, the number of workers applying for initial unemployment benefits rose for the second straight week, to 1.43 million, after nearly four months of decreases following a late-March peak. The Q2 economic contraction came as states imposed lockdowns in March and April to contain the coronavirus and then lifted restrictions in May and June, allowing growth to resume. Economists expect the third quarter to show growth, but the summer rise in infections likely will temper gains.
Senate fails to advance jobless benefits extension
Meanwhile, no signs of progress are evident in talks between Republicans and Democrats over a new coronavirus relief bill. The U.S. Senate failed yesterday to advance an effort to extend a $200 per week supplement to unemployment insurance benefits. Senate Republicans and the White House had sought to cut the supplement from $600 through September, after which those collecting unemployment benefits would get 70% of their previous wages when combined with state benefits. While much of the focus has been on the expiration of the additional $600-per-week of unemployment benefits, an eviction moratorium is receiving increasing attention as well.
China factory activity expands for fifth straight month
China’s official manufacturing purchasing managers' index came in better than expected, rising to 51.1 in July from 50.9 in June for its highest reading since March. July marked the fifth consecutive month that the closely watched measure of China's factory activity topped the 50 mark that separates expansion from contraction. Combined with China's official non-manufacturing purchasing managers' index, which indicated a slight deceleration in the service sector, the data suggests China's factories have returned to pre-coronavirus levels but consumer demand remains much weaker, which means inventory is piling up.
Chinese-backed hackers reportedly targeted Moderna for vaccine data
China rejects charges that hackers linked to its government targeted Moderna (NASDAQ:MRNA) to steal data related to research on a coronavirus vaccine. Citing an unnamed U.S. security official, Reuters reported yesterday that Chinese hackers targeted the U.S. biotech firm earlier this year. Moderna said it had been in contact with the FBI and was made aware of the suspected "information reconnaissance activities" by a hacking group mentioned in last week's Justice Department indictment, where two Chinese nationals were accused of spying on the U.S., including three unnamed U.S.-based targets involved in medical research to fight COVID-19. The two other unnamed medical research companies mentioned in the Justice Department indictment are described as biotech companies based in California and Maryland - descriptions that could fit Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ:GILD) and Novavax (NASDAQ:NVAX). Go deeper: J&J (NYSE:JNJ) COVID-19 vaccine candidate shows positive effect in primate study.
Amazon's $10 billion Internet satellite plan wins FCC approval
While overshadowed by the company's earnings, Amazon.com's (AMZN) tech ambitions got a boost as the FCC approved its $10B plan to put thousands of satellites in the sky to provide high-speed Internet to unserved and underserved areas. The company's Project Kuiper - using 3,200 low Earth orbit satellites - would compete in that area with the Starlink project at SpaceX (SPACE).
Australia to force Google, Facebook to pay for news
Australia will become the first country in the world to force Facebook (FB) and Google (GOOG, GOOGL) to pay publishers for the news content featured on its sites. It will give the companies three months to negotiate fair pay with media businesses there, a move to ensure competition and consumer protection as well as a sustainable media landscape. Other companies are likely to be targeted for similar moves by Australia's government later.
U.K. fraud office charges Airbus subsidiary over Saudi deal
The U.K.'s major economic crimes investigator has charged Airbus' (OTCPK:EADSY) subsidiary GPT Special Project Management and three individuals in connection with a defense contract the country arranged with Saudi Arabia. Airbus says the Serious Fraud Office's investigation related to contractual arrangements that predated its acquisition of the subsidiary. The charges represent a step forward in one of the SFO's most politically sensitive probes, which has been viewed as a potential threat to the U.K.'s relationship with the Saudis. Go deeper: Airbus works to slow cash burn, puts brakes on production.
What else is happening...
Walmart (NYSE:WMT) memo points to cutting jobs in 'streamlining.'
Facebook (FB) finally securing rights to show music videos.
Twitter (NYSE:TWTR) account breach involved phone-based phishing attacks on employees.
Thursday's Key Earnings Apple (AAPL) +6.3% PM on strong earnings, stock split. Amazon (AMZN) +5.5% PM on strong Q2 earnings, Q3 guidance. Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) flat PM after soft ad revenue. Facebook (FB) +5.9 PM on strong earnings, user growth. Ford Motor (NYSE:F) +2.5% PM despite seeing weak FY demand. Gilead Sciences (GILD) -3.6% PM as pandemic disrupts earnings. US Steel (NYSE:X) flat PM after Q2 loss, upbeat Q3 guidance. Electronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA) flat PM after Q2 beat, better-than-expected FY guidance. LTC Properties (NYSE:LTC) -3.2% AH as Q2 rental revenue takes a hit. Xilinx (NASDAQ:XLNX) -2.7% PM on in-line Q2, outlook. Stryker (NYSE:SYK) -2.8% AH despite Q2 beat. Vertex Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:VRTX) +1% AH on robust Q2 Trikafta sales. OPKO Health (NASDAQ:OPK) -6% PM after healthy Q2 earnings. Atlassian (NASDAQ:TEAM) -7% PM on FQ4 customer weakness, downside EPS forecast. Exact Sciences (NASDAQ:EXAS) -3% AH on pandemic disrupting Q2 revenue. Expedia (NASDAQ:EXPE) -6% PM after massive Q2 bookings dip. Seattle Genetics (NASDAQ:SGEN) -2% AH despite Q2 beat. Cabot Oil & Gas (NYSE:COG) flat PM after Q2 beat, unchanged guidance. XPO Logistics (NYSE:XPO) -4% AH on weak Q2 shipping metrics. Shake Shack (NYSE:SHAK) -4.8% AH on Q2 miss, pulled Q3 guidance.
Today's Markets In Asia, Japan -2.82%. Hong Kong -0.47%. China +0.71%. India -0.26%. In Europe, at midday, London -0.17%. Paris +0.01%. Frankfurt +0.27%. Futures at 6:20, Dow +0.13%. S&P +0.19%. Nasdaq +0.84%. Crude +0.45% to $40.05. Gold +1.48% to $1,995.90. Bitcoin +1.83% to $11,161. Ten-year Treasury Yield -1.3 bps to 0.53%
Today's Economic Calendar 8:30 Personal Income and Outlays 8:30 Employment Cost Index 9:45 Chicago PMI 10:00 Consumer Sentiment 1:00 PM Baker-Hughes Rig Count 3:00 PM Farm Prices
submitted by upbstock to Optionmillionaires [link] [comments]

TKEYSPACE 1.2.1 — large-scale update on iOS

TKEYSPACE 1.2.1 — large-scale update on iOS

https://preview.redd.it/1k8p8q10ttx41.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=390e03bd71dc3e49a380beae3600e44a2a110205
Meet a major update in TKEYSPACE. We were debugging the engine, so to speak-modified the Tkeycoin Engine. This is a really powerful update — large scale code-level improvements and new features.
Someone may think that an application is just ten lines of code, but an expert who thinks this is wrong.
TkeySpace is a combination of many libraries, support for C++, Java), Kotlin), Swift), Objective-C, cryptography and blockchain, and a combination of best practices with new technologies. To ensure the operation of many supported blockchains, the team has done a great job to ensure that you already use the most secure multi-currency wallet TkeySpace.

https://preview.redd.it/dk072ai1ttx41.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=e8b002b06d0a69b6b8f53e523d71d37ce4e2ec3c
For iOS development, we use the stack: C++, Swift, Objective-C. For Android development: C++, Java, Kotlin. Cryptography and blockchain parameters are applied on both platforms.
When creating TkeySpace, we primarily looked at security, decentralization, and convenience. TkeySpace is a strong programming code inside and a light intuitive interface outside.
TkeySpace eliminates hacker attacks, hacks, and sanctions from third parties, ensuring the comfortable use of your assets.
Remember that using the so-called “blockchain wallets”, of which there are a lot on the market — you risk losing funds. There are only a few truly working applications on the blockchain, which distinguishes the technical uniqueness of TkeySpace from other wallets. How TkeySpace works, we told you in the review: TKEYSPACE is a blockchain on your mobile.

What updates are available in TkeySpace 1.2.1 on iOS

Localization in the AppStore in 8 languages

Now the TkeySpace page in the AppStore is available in 8 languages: Russian, German, English, Spanish, French, Korean, Turkish, and Chinese.
https://preview.redd.it/77uoq213ttx41.png?width=1242&format=png&auto=webp&s=681e9f3133c0b63f330e0de19300138f61113d4b

Update on the code level

A large-scale work was done at the code level-optimization, interaction with libraries, new functions, and fixed errors that occurred during the wallet operation.

Synchronization

Fixed a local error displaying incorrect synchronization status, which affected the sending of transactions and interaction with blockchains.
The synchronization process has been completely fixed, and now the connection to the nodes is running correctly.
Node addresses are added to the local storage, and instant synchronization with nodes occurs when you log in again.

Transactions

Due to the correction of the synchronization process, errors that could occur when sending transactions have been fixed.
Added a synchronization check before sending transactions, now the wallet checks for synchronization with the network before performing any operation with digital currencies. If syncing isn’t set to 100% yet, then TkeySpace won’t let you send the transaction.

Enhanced validation of transactions and blocks in the network

Enhanced validation of the algorithm for consensus of Tkeycoin and other cryptocurrencies is enabled. This increases the security of the network, as well as speeds up the work of the TkeySpace blockchain node, the application consumes even fewer resources than before. High complexity is converted to 3 bytes, which ensures fast code processing and the least resource consumption on your device.

Checking “ Double spending”

TkeySpace now eliminates “double spending” in blockchains, which is very valuable in the Bitcoin and Litecoin networks. Your funds are safe and protected from fraudulent transactions in the form of “fake” transactions.

The bloom filter to check for nodes

All nodes are checked through the bloom filter. This allows you to exclude fraudulent nodes that try to connect to the network as real nodes of a particular blockchain.

Mining

Fixed a zero-byte decoding error that could cause the “mining reward” to not display in TkeySpace. Now all miners can extract currencies Tkeycoin, DASH, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin, Ethereum directly to Addresses from the TkeySpace app, which is very convenient, and most importantly, safe and always at hand.

The increased privacy of transaction

Implemented deterministic lexicographic sorting using hashes of previous transactions and output indexes for sorting transaction input data, as well as values and scriptPubKeys for sorting transaction output data.
The new transaction model makes it harder to identify certain wallets and increases privacy by using smart contracts.

Improvements at the TkeySpace interface level:

Upgraded currency rates

Now you can get detailed market statistics, both for 1 day and for several years. Statistics are available for periods: 1 day, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years. Statistics on volumes are available for both 1 hour and 24 hours.
https://preview.redd.it/huof1045ttx41.png?width=828&format=png&auto=webp&s=639c92c0bf6ed8b5f69b01f7a254bea533871dd1

News

In the market data section, there is a section with current news of the cryptocurrency market.

Function — to hide the balance

On the main screen of the TkeySpace app, you can completely hide your balance. Tap on the Balance, it will be automatically hidden from the main screen. This feature allows you to further enhance your privacy.
https://preview.redd.it/m9flh1m7ttx41.png?width=828&format=png&auto=webp&s=444684dabe03e6a73be3b306bd1f26fd7ffd0533

New currency

  • Added Litecoin (LTC) cryptocurrency;
  • Added 9 new tokens: Huobi Token (HT), KuCoin Shares (KCS), Golem (GNT), Ankr Network (ANKR), EOSDT, OmiseGO (OMG), Prospectors Gold (PGL), Pundi X (NPXS), NEXO.

To upgrade to the TkeySpace version-1.2.1 — we recommend completely reinstalling the TkeySpace app:

Delete the app — Install the app — Launch the wallet — click Restore Wallet — enter Backup phrases separated by a space — wait for syncing — now your TkeySpace wallet is fully ready to work.
App store: https://apps.apple.com/app/tkeyspace-future-focused/id1500778512 The official website of the keyspace: https://wallet.tkeycoin.com/
Suggestions for improving the app, errors that occur in the wallet, please send to our support service — [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]).
submitted by tkeycoin to Tkeycoin_Official [link] [comments]

Looking back 18 months.

I was going through old emails today and came across this one I sent out to family on January 4, 2018. It was a reflection on the 2017 crypto bull market and where I saw it heading, as well as some general advice on crypto, investment, and being safe about how you handle yourself in cryptoland.
I feel that we are on the cusp of a new bull market right now, so I thought that I would put this out for at least a few people to see *before* the next bull run, not after. While the details have changed, I don't see a thing in this email that I fundamentally wouldn't say again, although I'd also probably insist that people get a Yubikey and use that for all 2FA where it is supported.
Happy reading, and sorry for some of the formatting weirdness -- I cleaned it up pretty well from the original email formatting, but I love lists and indents and Reddit has limitations... :-/
Also, don't laught at my token picks from January 2018! It was a long time ago and (luckliy) I took my own advice about moving a bunch into USD shortly after I sent this. I didn't hit the top, and I came back in too early in the summer of 2018, but I got lucky in many respects.
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Jan-4, 2018
Hey all!
I woke up this morning to ETH at a solid $1000 and decided to put some thoughts together on what I think crypto has done and what I think it will do. *******, if you could share this to your kids I’d appreciate it -- I don’t have e-mail addresses, and it’s a bit unwieldy for FB Messenger… Hopefully they’ll at least find it thought-provoking. If not, they can use it as further evidence that I’m a nutjob. 😉
Some history before I head into the future.
I first mined some BTC in 2011 or 2012 (Can’t remember exactly, but it was around the Christmas holidays when I started because I had time off from work to get it set up and running.) I kept it up through the start of summer in 2012, but stopped because it made my PC run hot and as it was no longer winter, ********** didn’t appreciate the sound of the fans blowing that hot air into the room any more. I’ve always said that the first BTC I mined was at $1, but looking back at it now, that’s not true – It was around $2. Here’s a link to BTC price history.
In the summer of 2013 I got a new PC and moved my programs and files over before scrapping the old one. I hadn’t touched my BTC mining folder for a year then, and I didn’t even think about salvaging those wallet files. They are now gone forever, including the 9-10BTC that were in them. While I can intellectually justify the loss, it was sloppy and underlines a key thing about cryptocurrency that I believe will limit its widespread adoption by the general public until it is addressed and solved: In cryptoland, you are your own bank, and if you lose your password or account number, there is no person or organization that can help you reset it so that you can get access back. Your money is gone forever.
On April 12, 2014 I bought my first BTC through Coinbase. BTC had spiked to $1000 and been in the news, at least in Japan. This made me remember my old wallet and freak out for a couple of months trying to find it and reclaim the coins. I then FOMO’d (Fear Of Missing Out”) and bought $100 worth of BTC. I was actually very lucky in my timing and bought at around $430. Even so, except for a brief 50% swing up almost immediately afterwards that made me check prices 5 times a day, BTC fell below my purchase price by the end of September and I didn’t get back to even until the end of 2015.
In May 2015 I bought my first ETH at around $1. I sent some guy on bitcointalk ~$100 worth of BTC and he sent me 100 ETH – all on trust because the amounts were small and this was a small group of people. BTC was down in the $250 range at that point, so I had lost 30-40% of my initial investment. This was of the $100 invested, so not that much in real terms, but huge in percentages. It also meant that I had to buy another $100 of BTC on Coinbase to send to this guy. A few months after I purchased my ETH, BTC had doubled and ETH had gone down to $0.50, halving the value of my ETH holdings. I was even on the first BTC purchase finally, but was now down 50% on the ETH I had bought.
The good news was that this made me start to look at things more seriously. Where I had skimmed white papers and gotten a superficial understanding of the technology before FOMO’ing, I started to act as an investor, not a speculator. Let me define how I see those two different types of activity:
So what has been my experience as an investor? After sitting out the rest of 2015 because I needed to understand the market better, I bought into ETH quite heavily, with my initial big purchases being in March-April of 2016. Those purchases were in the $11-$14 range. ETH, of course, dropped immediately to under $10, then came back and bounced around my purchase range for a while until December of 2016, when I purchased a lot more at around $8.
I also purchased my first ICO in August of 2016, HEAT. I bought 25ETH worth. Those tokens are now worth about half of their ICO price, so about 12.5ETH or $12500 instead of the $25000 they would be worth if I had just kept ETH. There are some other things with HEAT that mean I’ve done quite a bit better than those numbers would suggest, but the fact is that the single best thing I could have done is to hold ETH and not spend the effort/time/cost of working with HEAT. That holds true for about every top-25 token on the market when compared to ETH. It certainly holds true for the many, many tokens I tried to trade in Q1-Q2 of 2017. In almost every single case I would have done better and slept better had I just held ETH instead of trying to be smarter than Mr. Market.
But, I made money on all of them except one because the crypto market went up more in USD terms than any individual coin went down in ETH or BTC terms. This underlines something that I read somewhere and that I take to heart: A rising market makes everyone seem like a genius. A monkey throwing darts at a list of the top 100 cryptocurrencies last year would have doubled his money. Here’s a chart from September that shows 2017 year-to-date returns for the top 10 cryptocurrencies, and all of them went up a *lot* more between then and December. A monkey throwing darts at this list there would have quintupled his money.
When evaluating performance, then, you have to beat the monkey, and preferably you should try to beat a Wall Street monkey. I couldn’t, so I stopped trying around July 2017. My benchmark was the BLX, a DAA (Digital Asset Array – think fund like a Fidelity fund) created by ICONOMI. I wasn’t even close to beating the BLX returns, so I did several things.
  1. I went from holding about 25 different tokens to holding 10 now. More on that in a bit.
  2. I used those funds to buy ETH and BLX. ETH has done crazy-good since then and BLX has beaten BTC handily, although it hasn’t done as well as ETH.
  3. I used some of those funds to set up an arbitrage operation.
The arbitrage operation is why I kept the 11 tokens that I have now. All but a couple are used in an ETH/token pair for arbitrage, and each one of them except for one special case is part of BLX. Why did I do that? I did that because ICONOMI did a better job of picking long-term holds than I did, and in arbitrage the only speculative thing you must do is pick the pairs to trade. My pairs are (No particular order):
I also hold PLU, PLBT, and ART. These two are multi-year holds for me. I have not purchased BTC once since my initial $200, except for a few cases where BTC was the only way to go to/from an altcoin that didn’t trade against ETH yet. Right now I hold about the same 0.3BTC that I held after my first $100 purchase, so I don’t really count it.
Looking forward to this year, I am positioning myself as follows:
Looking at my notes, I have two other things that I wanted to work into this email that I didn’t get to, so here they are:
  1. Just like with free apps and other software, if you are getting something of value and you didn’t pay anything for it, you need to ask why this is. With apps, the phrase is “If you didn’t pay for the product, you are the product”, and this works for things such as pump groups, tips, and even technical analysis. Here’s how I see it.
    1. People don’t give tips on stocks or crypto that they don’t already own that stock or token. Why would they, since if they convince anyone to buy it, the price only goes up as a result, making it more expensive for them to buy in? Sure, you will have friends and family that may do this, but people in a crypto club, your local cryptocurrency meetup, or online are generally not your friends. They are there to make money, and if they can get you to help them make money, they will do it. Pump groups are the worst of these, and no matter how enticing it may look, stay as far away as possible from these scams. I even go so far as to report them when I see them advertise on FB or Twitter, because they are violating the terms of use.
    2. Technical analysis (TA) is something that has been argued about for longer than I’ve been alive, but I think that it falls into the same boat. In short, TA argues that there are patterns in trading that can be read and acted upon to signal when one must buy or sell. It has been used forever in the stock and foreign exchange markets, and people use it in crypto as well. Let’s break down these assumptions a bit.
i. First, if crypto were like the stock or forex markets we’d all be happy with 5-7% gains per year rather than easily seeing that in a day. For TA to work the same way in crypto as it does in stocks and foreign exchange, the signals would have to be *much* stronger and faster-reacting than they work in the traditional market, but people use them in exactly the same way.
ii. Another area where crypto is very different than the stock and forex markets centers around market efficiency theory. This theory says that markets are efficient and that the price reflects all the available information at any given time. This is why gold in New York is similar in price to gold in London or Shanghai, and why arbitrage margins are easily <0.1% in those markets compared to cryptoland where I can easily get 10x that. Crypto simply has too much speculation and not enough professional traders in it yet to operate as an efficient market. That fundamentally changes the way that the market behaves and should make any TA patterns from traditional markets irrelevant in crypto.
iii. There are services, both free and paid that claim to put out signals based on TA for when one should buy and sell. If you think for even a second that they are not front-running (Placing orders ahead of yours to profit.) you and the other people using the service, you’re naïve.
iv. Likewise, if you don’t think that there are people that have but together computerized systems to get ahead of people doing manual TA, you’re naïve. The guys that I have programming my arbitrage bots have offered to build me a TA bot and set up a service to sell signals once our position is taken. I said no, but I am sure that they will do it themselves or sell that to someone else. Basically they look at TA as a tip machine where when a certain pattern is seen, people act on that “tip”. They use software to see that “tip” faster and take a position on it so that when slower participants come in they either have to sell lower or buy higher than the TA bot did. Remember, if you are getting a tip for free, you’re the product. In TA I see a system when people are all acting on free preset “tips” and getting played by the more sophisticated market participants. Again, you have to beat that Wall Street monkey.
  1. If you still don’t agree that TA is bogus, think about it this way: If TA was real, Wall Street would have figured it out decades ago and we would have TA funds that would be beating the market. We don’t.
  2. If you still don’t agree that TA is bogus and that its real and well, proven, then you must think that all smart traders use them. Now follow that logic forward and think about what would happen if every smart trader pushing big money followed TA. The signals would only last for a split second and would then be overwhelmed by people acting on them, making them impossible to leverage. This is essentially what the efficient market theory postulates for all information, including TA.
OK, the one last item. Read this weekly newsletter – You can sign up at the bottom. It is free, so they’re selling something, right? 😉 From what I can tell, though, Evan is a straight-up guy who posts links and almost zero editorial comments.
Happy 2018.
submitted by uetani to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

J.P. Morgan Early Look at the Market – Mon 10.16.17 - **PLEASE DO NOT FORWARD THIS DOCUMENT**

J.P. Morgan Early Look at the Market – Mon 10.16.17

SEC DISCLAMIER: PLEASE DO NOT FORWARD THIS DOCUMENT

Morning Levels

Trading Update

Top Headlines for Monday

Catalysts – big events to watch over the coming months

Full catalyst list

  • Wed Oct 18 – Fed speakers: Dudley, Kaplan.
  • Wed Oct 18 – US housing starts for Sept. 8:30amET.
  • Wed Oct 18 – US building permits for Sept. 8:30amET.
  • Wed Oct 18 – US Beige Book. 2pmET.
  • Wed Oct 18 – earnings before the open: ABT, Akzo Nobel, ASML, MTB, MTG, NTRS, Reckitt Benckiser, SVU, USB
  • Wed Oct 18 – earnings after the close: AA, AXP, BDN, BHE, BXS, CCI, CCK, EBAY, GHL, HXL, KALU, LLNW, SLG, SLM, STLD, TCBI, URI.
  • Thurs Oct 19 – China Q3 GDP and Sept retail sales, IP, and FAI (Wed night/Thurs morning)
  • Thurs Oct 19 – US Leading Index for Sept. 10amET.
  • Thurs Oct 19 – earnings before the open: ADS, BBT, BK, BX, DGX, DHR, DOV, GPC, KEY, Nestle, NUE, Pernod Ricard, Philips Lighting, PM, PPG, Publicis, RCI, Roche, SAP, SNA, SON, Thales, TRV, TSMC, TXT, Unilever, VZ, WBC, WGO.
  • Thurs Oct 19 – earnings after the close: ASB, ATHN, ETFC, ISRG, LHO, MXIM, NCR, PBCT, PFPT, PYPL, WDFC, WERN.
  • Fri Oct 20 – BOJ’s Kuroda speaks. 2:30amET.
  • Fri Oct 20 – US existing home sales for Sept. 10amET.
  • Fri Oct 20 – Yellen speaks to National Economists Club in Washington. 7:15pmET.
  • Fri Oct 20 – earnings before the open: Assa Abloy, BHGE, CFG, CLF, Daimler, DST, GE, GNTX, HON, InterContinental Hotels, KSU, MAN, PG, SLB, STI, SYF, TomTom, Volvo.
  • Mon Oct 23 – China Sept property prices (Sun night/Mon morning).
  • Mon Oct 23 – US Chicago Fed Activity Index for Sept. 8:30amET.
  • Mon Oct 23 – earnings before the open: HAL, HAS, ITW, KMB, LII, Philips, STT, STX, VFC
  • Mon Oct 23 – earnings after the close: ARNC, CR, JBT, OI, ZION.
  • Tues Oct 24 – Eurozone flash PMIs for Oct. 4amET.
  • Tues Oct 24 – ECB bank lending survey. 4amET.
  • Tues Oct 24 – US flash PMIs for Oct. 9:45amET.
  • Tues Oct 24 – earnings before the open: AMTD, Anglo American, BASF, BIIB, CAT, CLB, CNC, CVLT, ETR, Fiat Chrysler, FITB, GLW, GM, INFY, IPG, LLY, LMT, MAS, MCD, MMM, Novartis, PCAR, PHM, PNR, R, RF, SAH, SHW, SWK, UTX, WAT, WDR.
  • Tues Oct 24 – earnings after the close: AKAM, AMP, AXS, Canadian National Railway, CMG, COF, CYBE, DFS, ESRX, HLI, IRBT, IRM, MANH, NUVA, RGC, T, TSS, TXN.
  • Wed Oct 25 – US durable goods for Sept. 8:30amET.
  • Wed Oct 25 – US FHFA home price index for Aug. 9amET.
  • Wed Oct 25 – US new home sales for Sept. 10amET.
  • Wed Oct 25 – Bank of Canada rate decision. 10amET.
  • Wed Oct 25 – Brazilian rate decision (after the close).
  • Wed Oct 25 – earnings before the open: ALK, ALLY, ANTM, Antofagasta, AOS, APH, BA, BAX, BTU, Capgemini, Dassault Systemes, DPS, FCX, FLIR, Fresnillo, HBAN, Heineken, IP, IR, KO, LEA, LH, Lloyds Banking Group, NDAQ, NSC, NYCB, OC, Peugeot, SIRI, SLAB, TMO, TUP, V, WBA, WEC, WYN.
  • Wed Oct 25 – earnings after the close: ABX, ACGL, AFL, AMGN, CA, CLGX, DLR, FFIV, FNF, FTI, KIM, LSTR, MC, MLNX, NOW, NXPI, ORLY, PKG, PLXS, RJF, SSNC, TSCO, TYL, UNM, VAR, WCN, XLNX.
  • Thurs Oct 26 – Riksbank decision. 3:30amET.
  • Thurs Oct 26 – ECB rate decision. 7:45amET press release, 8:30amET press conf.
  • Thurs Oct 26 – US wholesale inventories for Sept. 8:30amET.
  • Thurs Oct 26 – US advance goods trade balance for Sept. 8:30amET.
  • Thurs Oct 26 – US pending home sales for Sept. 10amET.
  • Thurs Oct 26 – earnings before the open: ABB, ABX, Aixtron, ALLE, ALV, Anheuser Busch, APD, Bayer, BEN, BMS, BMY, BSX, BWA, CCMP, CELG, CHTR, CMCSA, CME, COP, Deutsche Bank, ENTG, EQT, EXLS, F, GNC, HLT, HSY, LUV, MMC, MKC, NEM, Nokia, OAK, ODFL, PX, Santander, Schneider Electric, SPGI, STM, TWTR, UNP, UPS, VC, VNTV, WM, XEL, XRX.
  • Thurs Oct 26 – earnings after the close: AIV, ATEN, CB, CDNS, CENX, CLS, EXPE, FLEX, FTNT, FTV, GILD, GOOG, HIG, INTC, LPLA, MAT, MSFT, NATI, PFG, PRO, SGEN, SIVB, SYK, VDSI, VRSN.
  • Fri Oct 27 – China Sept industrial profits (Thurs night/Fri morning).
  • Fri Oct 27 – US Q3 GDP, personal consumption, and core PCE for Q3. 8:30amET.
  • Fri Oct 27 – US Michigan Confidence numbers for Oct. 10amET.
  • Fri Oct 27 – earnings before the open: B, MRK, PSX, SC, TRU, Volkswagen, WY, XOM.
  • Mon Oct 30 – US personal income/spending and PCE for Sept. 8:30amET.
  • Mon Oct 30 – US Dallas Fed index for Oct. 10:30amET.
  • Mon Oct 30 – analyst meetings: CSX
  • Mon Oct 30 – earnings before the open: HSBC
  • Mon Oct 30 – earnings after the close: AVB, CGNX, RE, RTEC, VNO
  • Tues Oct 31 – BOJ rate decision (Mon night/Tues morning).
  • Tues Oct 31 – US Employment Cost Index for Q3. 8:30amET.
  • Tues Oct 31 – US Case-Shiller home price index for Aug. 9amET.
  • Tues Oct 31 – US Chicago PMI for Oct. 9:45amET.
  • Tues Oct 31 – US Conference Board Sentiment readings for Oct. 10amET.
  • Tues Oct 31 – earnings before the open: ADM, AET, Airbus, AMT, Barclays, BNP, CMI, ECL, FIS, GGP, K, MA, OSK, PFE, XYL.
  • Tues Oct 31 – earnings after the close: APC, CHRW, CXO, PLT, WFT, X
  • Wed Nov 1 – US ADP jobs report for Oct. 8:15amET.
  • Wed Nov 1 – US Markit Manufacturing PMI for Oct. 9:45amET.
  • Wed Nov 1 – US Manufacturing ISM for Oct. 10amET.
  • Wed Nov 1 – US construction spending report for Sept. 10amET.
  • Wed Nov 1 – US auto sales for Oct.
  • Wed Nov 1 – FOMC meeting decision. 2pmET.
  • Wed Nov 1 – earnings before the open: AGN, APO, CEVA, CLX, EL, GRMN, HFC, LFUS, Novo Nordisk, ORBK, Standard Chartered, TAP, TRI.
  • Wed Nov 1 – earnings after the close: ALL, BHF, BXP, CACI, CAVM, CSGS, EGOV, FB, LNC, MANT, MET, MUSA, OXY, PRU, QCOM, ULTI, XPO.
  • Thurs Nov 2 – BOE rate decision. 8amET.
  • Thurs Nov 2 – US nonfarm productivity and unit labor costs for Q3. 8:30amET.
  • Thurs Nov 2 – earnings before the open: ADP, AN, BCE, CI, Credit Suisse, DISCA, H, ICE, LDOS, Royal Dutch Shell, Sanofi, Swiss Re, WRK.
  • Thurs Nov 2 – earnings after the close: AAPL, AIG, ATVI, CBS, CRUS, FLR, HLF, JCOM, RMAX, SBUX, UNIT.
  • Fri Nov 3 – US jobs report for Oct. 8:30amET.
  • Fri Nov 3 – US trade balance for Sept. 8:30amET.
  • Fri Nov 3 – US factory orders and durable goods orders for Sept. 10amET.
  • Fri Nov 3 – US non-manufacturing ISM for Oct. 10amET.
  • Mon Nov 6 – Fed’s Dudley speaks at The Economist Club of New York.
  • Tues Nov 7 – RBA rate decision. Mon night/Tues morning.
  • Tues Nov 7 – US JOLTs jobs report for Sept. 10amET.
  • Tues Nov 7 – US consumer credit for Sept. 3pmET.
  • Thurs Nov 9 – US wholesale trade sales/inventories for Sept. 10amET.
  • Fri Nov 10 – US Michigan Confidence preliminary numbers for Nov. 10amET.
  • Tues Nov 14 – US PPI for Oct. 8:30amET.
  • Wed Nov 15 – US CPI for Oct. 8:30amET.
  • Wed Nov 15 – US Empire Manufacturing for Nov. 8:30amET.
  • Wed Nov 15 – US retail sales for Oct. 8:30amET.
  • Wed Nov 15 – US business inventories for Sept. 10amET.
  • Thurs Nov 16 – US import prices for Oct. 8:30amET.
  • Thurs Nov 16 – US industrial production for Oct. 9:15amET.
  • Thurs Nov 16 – US NAHB housing index for Nov. 10amET.
  • Fri Nov 17 – US housing starts and building permits for Oct. 8:30amET.
  • Mon Nov 20 – US Leading Index for Oct. 10amET.
  • Tues Nov 21 – US existing home sales for Oct. 10amET.
  • Wed Nov 22 – US durable goods for Oct. 8:30amET.
  • Wed Nov 22 – US final Michigan Confidence numbers for Nov. 10amET.
  • Wed Nov 22 – FOMC 11/1 meeting minutes. 2pmET.
  • Fri Nov 24 – US flash PMIs for Nov. 9:45amET.
J.P. Morgan Market Intelligence is a product of the Institutional Equities Sales and Trading desk of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and the intellectual property thereof. It is not a product of the Research Department and is intended for distribution to institutional and professional customers only and is not intended for retail customer use. It may not be reproduced, redistributed or transmitted, in whole or in part, without J.P. Morgan’s consent. Any unauthorized use is strictly prohibited.
submitted by SIThereAndThere to wallstreetbets [link] [comments]

To BSG, Expecially Nikita i Would also love for Kotton,Klean,Deadlyslob to put their 2 cents.

i wanna first apologize for my english , im not native im self taught.
Hi everyone , Expecially Nikita for creating a game that i dreamed of since i was a kid. all the other streamers i mentioned its just because you guys play the game alot "just like me" and know pretty much everything about tarkov.
i wanna start off by mentioning a few things about myself to avoid that the kids start spamming "fanboy/l2p/" and all kind of trash comments that i will ignore accordingly. Currently Level 42 Ingame "finished all quests on Day 3" This is a list of what "I" myself think , can make the game better , QOL improvements , changes and tweaks. Also here's my Sys Specs when we get to talk performances. 500gb SSD samsung 840evo i7 6700k Overclocked to 4.8 Ghz. 32gb DDR4 XMP 2.0 2400mhz Corsair Vengeance LPX Asus Rog GTX 1080ti
lets address the first thing that has been seen as an issue.
1) Hatchling. i dont care about hatchling , myself rarely i go for a couple of factory or shoreline hatchet runs , trying to get from 0 to hero just for the challenge of it. A Swing of an Hatchet to the head WILL kill you IRL. so its only fair that the hatchet change gets reverted. to make it "more fair" Left Click on head has to be oneshot , even with 0 STR. Right Click has to be double tap , a blunt hit on the face IRL wont kill you , but will surely stun/disorient you , do alot of damage (just apply the same effect as when you get headshotted with a helmet. ALSO IMPORTANT: to remove "atleast for the moment" some of the desync issues. Remove the Runspeed bonus while Wielding a hatchet. So hatchet is reliable , but not "abusable" for the state of the netcode and servers at the moment.
2) Performance/Netcode: Big issues with the performances atleast from my own experience its only when Scavs are present on the map , and in big numbers. as for the netcode even if Everyone says its better , atleast for me its not. I've noticed in this patch that there's alot more Unregistered Hits on people. in patch 0.7 i could reliable 1 tap , 2 tap people with ease , in this patch sometimes i find myself unloading from 30 to 47 bullets in a person , and he receives 0 damage. something is definatly wrong. My advice is to disable Server Selection , until everything else gets worked out correctly. since right now when im having around 35/40 Ping , people are shooting 1 second , or 1 second and a half , before i can even Hear or See them (its highly noticeable expecially in factory).
3) Hacking: there's not much that can be done here , my suggestion is to have a team atleast of 3 4 people "klean is already doing it" to review Clip and check if someone is actually hacking. but what we really need is BSG to lets say either Hire or Find 3 4 people that are willing to review Logs(If Server and instances have logs on whats happening in a game during a certain time helps)/Clips and actively Hunt for hackers ensure that they are cheating and then proceed to Report to the people to land the ban. I can also be one of those people , for free i dont care , i love tarkov and i have experience in working with Anticheat companies aswell.
4) the STRENGHT "Issue" Strenght is a Skill that without it , the movement feels dull and unresponsive and too slow. (as of right now too slow and hard to skill) if i have to make a rework to strenght i would remove the Speed Bonus , from a 100% , and lets say put it 50% and put it as the "standard" PMC movement speed. Also Run Speed shouldnt Be Istantaneous but Reached overtime. example , im sprinting , from the regular Sprinting speed , in 3 seconds i get to 50% movement speed bonus "faster". or less seconds or more "requires testing" Everyone moves at the same speed. then Rework Strenght to lets say. Wearing Heavy Armor in a raid walking/sprinting/jumping around with it , will Increase your Strenght. and the Strenght (the higher it is) the less Movement/Turning Penalties for Wearing Heavy Armor. Remove the speed bonus for running with an Hatchet , and leave it like it is for other weapons. "you just run faster with a pistol" actually encourages people to bring a secondary. also Make the Strenght affect how fast you can Breach a door. Remove the "Throwing Strenght" for grenades and move that perk to Throwables. Elite Perk: Removes the Penalties for Wearing High Tier Armor run at 50% movement speed with AssaultRifles/Snipers aswell "Same as Everyone else"
5) Endurance (It levels wayyyyyy too slow) wayyy too much. it needs to be upped a tiny bit. Walking/Sprinting/Jumping Should level your endurance. also Holding Breath While ADS should Contribute a tiny bit.
6) Attention: Still doesnt seems like its working , Container Looting Speed and item rarity increase doesnt seem to work (i could be wrong) i have 20 attention , and a buddy of mine has 0 , we did 20 runs together looting 6 Filing Cabinets , 5 jackets , 2 Safes "each one of us" and most of the time he found the better stuff with almost 1 attention. (Could be RNG but have a look at that). it gets boring Fast when you are level 40+ and you have looted the entire world , but everytime you loot a jacket , filing cabinet , most of the things , it takes ages.
7) Charisma doesnt seems like its working yet
Moving away from softskills.
8) AUDIO
i've noticed there's a lot of problems with audio. Positional Audio definatly made things better but Sometimes "even with 40 perception" you cant hear a person Sprinting next to you. and sometimes you can hear them moving in covert / muffle movement. there's huge inconsistency in the Audio that needs to be looked at.
9) Unpopular Opinion , MEDS and BLACK LIMBS I never liked the "BLACKLIMB" mechanic , and i probably never will but as i said previously this is just my "Idea".
Grizzly KIT right now its useless. Grizzly Should be Able to Restore a BlackLimb. at the cost of 33.3% of durability "or something around that number" that will give you 3 Chances to restore black Limbs. How many times you start a raid , the first bullet that flies , you got both your Legs Black and your stomach Black , you gotta extract. Sometimes i just prefer to die than doing the entire way that as of this Patch you cant even Run with black limbs. (i mean you can) but you cant.
Either Make the Grizzly to Fix BlackLimbs. or add an Additional Equipment Slot on the PMC "like a backpack" but you can only put a grizzly there where it can contain up to 6 or 8 Meds that you can QuickBind on the Hotbar 4/5/6/7/8 etc.
or Give us some kind of Expensive med that takes 1 or 2 Slot , that give us the ability to restore 1 black limb. in my honest opinion BlackLimb its not fun nor realistic.
I mean , IRL if i get shot in the leg yeah. i cant walk i get it. but i dont die by getting my leg turned to minced meat even with a 60 RND mag emptied on IT. the fact that you can get 1/2 Tapped with a Shotgun/Saiga on the legs while Wearing 1mil Roubles worth of Armor Makes absolutely no sense.
i Understand that you shoot somebody on the legs , you make him move slower , then you finish him off by shooting him on the body or head. I think this requires some thought , and a change.
10) Weapon Costs. im going to mention pistols cause.. APS,Glock,SR1,Grach cost should be tuned. an AR is Less Expensive than a pistol , a Glock with 21RND Mag and a flashlight sells for 30k Roubles , not even an AK74N sells for that much.
11) Quests , The fun , The Grind , The Unfun: for quests. to be honest i enjoyed most of the quests during the patch. the quest i actually hated. alot are
Ice Cream Cones: it takes way too much to find 6 60 rnd Mags for the quest. the spawn Rate is Abysmal and its only a Painful quest. and the most effective way to complete it is to Rush the ZB-14 Bunker in Woods (Map that only a few people like) Due to the Spawns , and the Poor Hotspot locations on the map.
Pretty Much , most of the shoreline quests. since the Performance and Stutter on Shoreline makes the Experience really really annoying.
Fishing Gear: the fact that you have to place a 100k Rouble Rifle in a fishing boat and takes more than 30 seconds to do its a quest that i dont really like. also the reward of the quest its kinda unjustified for such a quest.
Wet Job Part 6: Absolutely the quest that "kinda" makes no sense , and i hate to do. Level 7 Snipers ? for AP M4 M995 ammo ? a Fully Kitted M4 goes for over 200k Roubles , and to get the "good" ammo you have to grind for days and days and days the State of the Sniper Rifles in the game at the moment is Poor. Autobolting , Wierd Zeroing , Performance Drops with Scopes. Make the quest a pure Nightmare. Also Why should i spend Millions of Roubles to Buy SniperRifles "cause there are extremely High Chances that you are going to die alot" while trying to complete this quest to Unlock an "Assault Rifle Armor Penetrating Round". it Makes more Sense to Change from Sniper level 7 , to Assault Rifles level 7.
Save the Sniper Level Skill quests when Sniper Rifles are actually Fun to use , Working , and when we have more sniper rifles in the game "Grind Snipers to Level 7 , you get a free Barret .50 cal , and the chance to buy them" this is what i call a reward for a grind. "its just an example".
12) Inventory Management , Game Editions Perks , Trader Adjustments
as for perks the only thing i would add is. a Keybar. for Standard Edition and Above. Keybar is essential to the game and run a proper raid also with all the keys that are in the game Right now. the only way to obtain a keybar is running marked "with low % of spawn chance" always if you get there first. and with the Addition of "Durability" For Keys it will be even more "required". Every Standard Edition Player cant even fit Quests Items in their stash , its time for an Upgrade of Stash for All editions. since there are way TOO many quest items , barter items , and just not enough space to put them. I know that Stash Upgrades should come with Hideouts but seriously. the more quests get added , the harder it becomes. half of my EOD stash is Quest items for future Quests of my StandardEdition friend. and he has other quest items aswell.
Keybar should be in the starting gear of Every single edition , and Keybar as an "utility" item we should be able to barter it from Therapist. Same thing goes for document bag , document bag is extremely rare , and you can only put in either Money or Keys. i Would say if you want to keep the document bag this rare , allow it to fit Bitcoins and Goldchains aswell. "you can do it irl , i dont see a reason why we cant ingame" or Allow us to Barter for a document bag from Either Mechanic for 1 or 2 Bitcoins , or Therapist for like some Goldchains or something else.
MBSS Backpack for 2 dogtags ? simply not worth it / unfun. MBSS is a entry level backpack where you cant even put a shotgun in it. it should be able to Be bought , not traded.
The MP153 Shotgun is Too big i remember the change was made to avoid the Influx of M4's Back in 0.6 was it ? or .7 i forgot. it should take 1 less slot. and it should fit in a Trizip atleast. the fact that you can only fit it in a Pilgrim or new Bag. its sad.
i wanna conclude for the moment by saying that for quality of life improvement we should be able to.
"DoubleClick" to buy 1 item or have the "fill items/Deal" next to eachother. Faster Transition Between Traders: Switching between traders is slow and boring.
i've got alot of other ideas , but atm i guess this is "alot" and enough , for the moment.
i Know Nikita that you and your team are working hard on the game , but alot of things are getting overlooked atm that would make the experience 10 times better and more enjoyable for everyone. This is just my 2 cents , i would love a response tho.
PS: Im an Indie Dev myself , mainly Level Designer , Modeler. and i know how most of the Things work developing side.
submitted by tronne to EscapefromTarkov [link] [comments]

Summary: pitfalls of paper wallets

Pitfalls and solutions of paper wallets

Creating paper wallets:

Problematic action: Create a paper wallet on a paper wallet service website without disconnecting from the internet. Reason: It's extremely insecure for many reasons, some being 1) the website is hacked with generated private keys sent to the hacker; 2) there may be malware in the browser or in the operating system that sends the private keys to the hacker. Solution: The bottom line is to disconnect the internet before creating the paper wallet. It's not secure enough because 1) the malware can save the private keys and wait for internet connection to send them out; 2) the malware can interfere with the generation process itself and give you a private key that is already known to the hacker, which is called backdooring the random number generator; 3) the private keys may exist on the hard disk therefore may be extracted by malware or after the computer is disposed. Better solution: Download the paper wallet app from an online computer. Copy it to an offline computer via a flash drive. Run it from there. Best solution: Use a live operating system, such as a Linux live CD, to run the paper wallet app. This is not ultimately bullet-proof, especially for high-value targets, because there exist malware that can hide in the BIOS and firmware of your computer and can infect your live operating system. It should be secure enough for average Joes.
Problematic action: Create a paper wallet without serious verifications. Reason: There may be incompatible issues with operating systems and browsers. Solution: Run tests on various operating systems and various browsers before putting BTC in. Make sure the generated private keys are identical. This applies to regular paper wallets and BIP38 paper wallets. Make sure the decrypted BIP38 keys are correct.
Problematic action: Create a brain wallet created by bitaddress.org or other brain wallets without key stretching. Reason: It has been proven insecure. Solution: Use WarpWallet or other brain wallets with key stretching, e.g., scrypt, bcrypt, sha512crypt, pbkdf2, and so on.

Printing paper wallets:

Problematic action: Use a wireless printer. Reason: It's insecure because wireless networks are insecure. Solution: Use a wired printer.
Problematic action: Use an advanced printer, which has internal storage, such as a hard drive. Reason: It is insecure because the private key of the paper wallet printed may be stored on the internal storage, therefore may be recovered if the printer is sold or scrapped. Solution: Use a dumb printer. Or keep the printer locked up and never sell or scrap it. Or smash the printer, including and especially the internal storage.
Problematic action: Leave the printer open for other people to access after printing without turning it off. Reason: It's insecure because the private key printed may still be in the memory of the printer. Solution: Turn the printer off after printing.
Problematic action: Leave the computer untreated after printing. Reason: It's insecure because the printer driver and/or operating system may be keeping copies of the documents you print in some sort of "spool" or print queue. Solution: Use a live operating system, such as a Linux live CD, to print.
Problematic action: Use a shared printer (at work or school, for example). Reason: It's insecure because 1) the printer may have a glitch and someone else may get your printouts; 2) the printing jobs may be centrally logged. Solution: Don't. Use your own printer.
Problematic action: Use a printer to print the private key or the QR code of the private key. Reason: See above. Solution 1: Don't use a printer for private key stuff. Hand-write the private key. Hand-draw the QR code if you and the helping checker are patient enough. Or ignore the QR code since hand-drawing the QR code of the private key may be too time-consuming. Double check. Then check it again, preferably on a different day. Get someone you trust to check it. Then get him/her to check it again, preferably on a different day. (Testing the private key in a wallet app can make it sure. But it comes with risks.) Solution 2: Don't use a printer for private key stuff. Use brain wallet. Write down the passphrase and the relevant information, e.g., the name of the tool used, e.g., WarpWallet, and the instructions. Store it the same way as a paper wallet. Save and store some copies of the tool, in case the future versions become incompatible. (There are pitfalls for creating man-made passphrases. It is beyond the scope of this post. In a nutshell, don't create the passphrase (solely) with your brain, and don't keep the passphrase (solely) with your brain.)

Spending from paper wallets:

Problematic action: Import a paper wallet private key into a wallet app, then spend directly from the paper wallet address.
Mistake: Expect the paper wallet automatically receives/holds changes, similar to a real-life wallet, which may not be the case. Reason: Early wallet apps didn't handle the changes correctly. The changes became the transaction fees of the miners. There is a misunderstanding of how Bitcoin works. There is no account balance of any kind in Bitcoin. There is only Unspent Transaction Outputs (UTXOs). The receiving addresses of changes, which will become the new UTXOs, must be specified when BTC is spent. Otherwise, the changes will automatically become the transaction fees. This depends on the implementation of the wallet app, which should not be trusted.
Mistake: Think nothing is wrong if changes are handled correctly. Reason: It's called address reuse, which is not recommended in Bitcoin because 1) it reduces anonymity of both the sender and all the consecutive receivers; 2) it reduces the security by exposing the public key, which is vulnerable to quantum computing. Addresses are hashes of public keys, which are safe from quantum computing.
Mistake: Destroy the paper wallet after it's imported into an HD wallet, thinking that it has become a part of the HD wallet and it's safe to destroy because the master seed of the HD has been backed up. Reason: It is not a part of the HD wallet. If the paper wallet (the paper) is destroyed and the app is uninstalled, the BTC is gone even if the HD wallet is recovered from its master seed.
The right way: Spend (transact) all BTC in a paper wallet to an address of your wallet app. It is called "sweeping", which is completely different from importing the private key. Spend BTC from there. After all the spending is finished, create a new paper wallet and transact all the remaining BTC to it. Store the new paper wallet. Keep the old one for future reference, or destroy it if you don't want the trace.

Destroying paper wallets:

Problematic action: Destroy a paper wallet after it is used. Reason: You may need to prove you had control of that address some day, e.g., for taxation purpose. In the case of a chain split, you may have a balance on the other chain. Solution: Don't ever destroy a paper wallet. Keep it on file. Mark it with the relevant information, e.g., "Used in April 2017". Unless you don't want to be tied to the address.

Pitfalls not specific to but more likely happen to paper wallets:

Problematic action: Google a famous wallet app, click the first link or the sponsored link, download/install it, and use it, without serious research. Reason: It's insecure because the wallet app may be a scam. Solution: Do thorough research prior to deciding which wallet app to use. Find the official site prior to downloading/installing it.
Additions and corrections are welcome.
Edit: multiple editing for additions, corrections, and clarifications.
Disclaimer: Although I set off to make this article in order to use paper wallet safely, I ended up not using it. Some of the solutions are collected from the internet. Some are my untested ideas. Use the article at your risk.
submitted by exab to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

We need to break up the unholy alliance between the Chinese miners and Core / Blockstream.

We signed up for a grand experiment that would be controlled by math and not by men.
Now we've had a year where the community is coming apart at the seams and today top dev Mike Hearn is selling his coins and abandoning the project.
Are we going to let Bitcoin be killed by 10 miners with cheap electricity & cooling behind the Great Firewall of China and a private company which wants to cripple our code by limiting space on the blockchain and adding double-spends and high fees?
I'm really trying seriously here to put my finger on the main problems that are causing this whole Bitcoin thing to spin out of control.
I think the two biggest problems are:
(1) the concentration of most hashpower behind the Great Firewall of China,
(2) allowing Blockstream to hijack Satoshi's codebase, so that they could:
...both of which are essential for their flagship vaporware product Lightning Network.
Analyzing these two problems in more detail:
(1) Most hashpower is behind the Great Firewall of China
Most hashpower is concentrated in China, behind what is essentially a network partition (or at least a major speed bump) on the global network topology: the Great Firewall of China.
So if blocks got really big, the miners outside of China might actually suffer more, not the miners inside China (who have pretty decent bandwidth amongst themselves).
(If you've already heard a million times about US jobs being exported to China, you can skip down to the next section - the short section starting with a sentence in bold saying "Wouldn't it be ironic...").
Now for a bit of economic background that most people know but I wanted to just review it here.
As we know, countries such as the USA used to have a solid domestic manufacturing base. But then the power elite in the USA discovered that it was easier to fire more-expensive US workers and let underpaid Chinese workers breathing smog produce cheaper (ie, lower-price and often lower-quality) versions of those same goods - and then the Fed could just print up unlimited little pieces of paper (fiat US Dollars) to import all that stuff to the USA.
Paying workers decent wages and keeping the air breathable would have been expensive, but the Chinese have evidently shown they're fine with sacrificing those things.
So now:
Anyways, most people know about this outsourcing and money-printing situation I've just described, but I mentioned it here as a lead-in to suggest a weird ironic point about mining in China (in bold at the start of the next, short section below).
As we also know, the world finally has real money now: Bitcoin.
It's "real" because it's not infinitely printable by private central bankers who inject it into the economy as usurious debt, and because, like gold, its value doesn't depend on any "counterparty": you simply hold your value yourself, and verify it yourself - assuming you have enough bandwidth to run a full a/k/a verifying node.
So, I'll finally give the weird ironic point I've been building up to:
Wouldn't it be ironic if - now that we finally have "real", quality money - we let its "manufacturing" (issuance, mining) be outsourced to China?
Because that looks like what we've actually been doing here.
Plus, maybe in some un-apparent, heretofore un-considered sense, the Great Firewall of China really might be the ultimate form of "capital control".
Forget all those articles you read on ZeroHedge about billions about dollars being smuggled out of China via Macau, with people strapping little bundles of cash to their bodies under their clothes:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-03-15/how-smuggle-money-out-china
What if the real massive hemorrhaging of capital which the Chinese authorities are worried about is Bitcoin itself - and what if that's the main reason why they're gonna make sure they keep the Great Firewall of China in place - to keep billions (and maybe someday trillions?) of dollars in Bitcoins inside China?
I don't think Satoshi took the Great Firewall of China into account in his planning. I think he just assumed there would be one globally connected internet, with no top-level partitions.
So here's some things to think about:
  • From what I'm told, the Chinese work hard and they're wild about saving money - they have trillions of dollars in T-Bills, and a lot of them are into gold. In the aggregate, the country is swimming in various forms of wealth.
  • Also: their government has strict capital controls in place to try to prevent people from expatriating vast sums of wealth out of China.
  • And finally: many Chinese want real money. They know the dollar or the yuan could crash, so they want something which has no counterparty risk (like gold or bitcoin).
So I'd be curious to know who the buyers really are for all the bitcoins currently being "cheaply" manufactured in China.
Do bitcoins mined in China stay in China - or do they get sold to the rest of the world?
I would guess that most early Bitcoin adopters with large hodlings who got in when it was really cheap were probably Westerners (assuming that early news about Bitcoin was more available in the West).
But now, while Bitcoin is "still" in the USD 400s (which could be cheap, if it survives long-term) - I wonder who the main buyers are these days?
Is it people like Blythe Masters and other bankers who are sitting on billions of USD - or is it the Chinese who are also sitting on billions of USD as well? (Or: Why not both?)
One group I'm pretty sure isn't buying up lots of bitcoins: "average Americans".
Why? Because they're too broke.
Since Nixon unlinked the USDollar from gold im 1971, Americans have been getting screwed by insidious inflation and all the debt bubbles which formed around all the essentials in life (the housing debt bubble, the student loan debt bubble, the healthcare and pharma debt bubble, and the credit bubble which fuels all the others). Most Americans don't have enough cash to survive for more than a few weeks, and most can't even afford to take sick days or parental leave from work. The only people who have money are the ones near the printing presses: the bankers and their buddies.
There's certainly massive volume on several of the Chinese exchanges - although most people over on /BitcoinMarkets claim that it's all "faked" (mainly because there's no fees on those exchanges, so a lot of those trades could be "wash trades").
So, maybe the Chinese themselves are actually buying up a lot of those freshly-mined bitcoins, in China, using the trillions of dollars of T-Bills sloshing around in their system over there?
(And remember where those T-Bills ultimately came from: US Dollars which the USA printed up to buy cheap goods produced by Chinese slaves breathing smog.)
So - and here's my point again:
Wouldn't it be ironic - now that the world finally has real, quality money - if we were actually currently outsourcing all of its production to China - and they (plus a handful of scattered bankers) are the ones who all buying up the first real asset the world has ever known, during its current "mid-priced" phase?
(2) Core / Blockstream / Peter Todd / Theymos / max blocksize / RBF / LN
Where to begin? I'm sure you all know the story. Just a few reminders about RBF terminology:
(a) There are two orthogonal "axes" or "dimensions" to the whole RBF terminology (but some people get this wrong - I have no idea if it's intentionally or accidentally):
  • "Opt-In" vs "On-By-Default": This means what it says: for each transaction, you either enable RBF, or you don't:
    • "Opt-In" means the sender has to enable RBF for a particular transaction (ie: it's off-by-default)
    • "On-By-Default" would mean that RBF is "always on" but the sender could disable it for a particular transaction.
  • "Full" vs "FSS":
    • "Full" means the sender can change everything about the transaction: not only the fee but also the amount and the recipient.
    • "FSS" stands for "First Seen Safe" (by the way, where do the pinheads over at Core even get this retarded non-descriptive terminology anyways: FSS, RBF??). FSS means that the sender can alter only the fee - the amount and the recipient cannot be changed.
So, which combo of the above is Peter Todd / Core currently trying to force on users?
Opt-In Full RBF
I reviewed the terminology here to pre-emptively shut up the liars who often pop into these threads spreading FUD like "But it's only Opt-In so it's not really Full".
That is simply wrong and I'm tired of them conflating those two orthogonal (ie independent) dimensions of the terminology.
And oh yeah, another thing: I have heard plenty of rumors that the long-term plan (from the traitors at Core / Blockstream) is to eventually (stealthily) force the worst form of RBF on everyone:
On-By-Default Full RBF
But that will come later - once the frogs being slowly boiled (us, the victims of Blockstream's hijacking of Satoshi's code) have gradually gotten acclimated to "Opt-In Full RBF".
Anyways, now that that's out of the way, let's talk about some other things regarding RBF:
Yes we know, we know: Peter is "merely" adding something which any hacker or malicious user could have added anyways (if they modded the code, or if they tried really hard to misuse it).
But there's plenty of stuff which anybody do by modding the code.
For example - anyone could change the code so that it accepts a different block size. (In fact, BU is mainly about making this easy for users - instead of making double-spending easy for users like RBF does.)
So the "convenience barrier" is an important factor helping shape what most users do with the code. If a feature isn't already in the code, most users don't bother modding the C/C++ code and recompiling it and adding it. (Which is one reason why zero-conf has worked pretty well for so long - another reason being that in face-to-face retail, the retailer kinda does KYC already - ie, they literally "know their customer" to a certain degree - so certain social pressures and norms such as reputation do come into play - but Peter Todd doesn't really believe in those things, as we know.)
Now, Theymos / Core / Blockstream keep screaming that it would be taboo to mod the code so that it would accept bigger blocks.
But when Blockstream wants mod the code so that it allows double-spending unconfirmed transactions - well, in it goes.
That's because the real reason they're so gung-ho to get Full RBF added is because LN needs Full RBF in order to be able to work.
So... when certain people say "we need to allow confused users to be able to unstuck their transactions", they're lying.
The liars at Blockstream don't care about users, and they don't care about miners. They want to rip off users (making them pay massive fees for space on an artificially tiny blockchain) and then in a double-whammy they want to rip off miners as well (stealing fees from those miners, via LN).
Attention Bitcoin users and miners: Core / Blockstream don't care about you, and they're willing to lie to you in order to rip you off.
As Mike Hearn mentioned in his farewell essay today, Blockstream CTO Gregory Maxwell once "mathematically proved" that Bitcoin could not exist.
And Blockstream founder Adam Back missed the boat on being an early adopter of Bitcoin, because when he first heard about it years ago, he also didn't think it would work.
And the gullible Chinese miners are running software from these liars at Blockstream who don't believe in Bitcoin who are sabotaging Satoshi's code to decrease user adoption (and price)) and eventually steal miners' fees. If miners continue to blindly follow Core / Blockstream, it's going to hurt the miners themselves.
The Nine Miners of China: "Core is a red herring. Miners have alternative code they can run today that will solve the problem. Choosing not to run it is their fault, and could leave them with warehouses full of expensive heating units and income paid in worthless coins." – tsontar
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/3xhejm/the_nine_miners_of_china_core_is_a_red_herring/
And users who are still gullible enough to adopt a decentralized currency and then read about it on centralized censored forums controlled by some dweeb named Theymos are also going along with this.
Anyways, that's my rant for today.
Summary / Conclusions - plus a possible "nuclear" option (see the bold part below!)
The main obstacles which Bitcoin needs to get around now are:
  • the concentration of hashpower behind the Great Firewall in China
  • the adoption of Peter Todd's RBF which would provide a GUI telling users they can and should double-spend or reverse transactions which haven't been confirmed on the blockchain yet
  • allowing Core / Blockstream to artificially limit space on the blockchain - which drives up user fees, clogs the network, and supports their LN vaporware (which would also steal fees from miners)
  • if you signed up for a decentralized permissionless currency and you're happy to read about it on a centralized censored website owned by Theymos (/bitcoin, bitcointalk.org), then you're doing it wrong.
These things were not what Satoshi envisioned, and I suggest we focus on trying to figure out how to get around them.
Solutions which de-emphasize the importance of Chinese miners might be important. If their blind obedience to Core / Blockstream is one of the main factors killing Bitcoin, then why should we protect them?
Maybe if we're going to hard-fork, we shouldn't just bump up the max blocksize - maybe we should also invoke the nuclear option and change the PoW algorithm to bump the Chinese miners off the network.
Because, the whole story about needing small blocks "so that Luke-Jr with his shitty internet can stay on the network" is another lie being peddled by Blockstream.
The real reason was identified by Gavin:
"The physical bottleneck on the network today is not bandwidth to people's homes, it is the Great Firewall of China."
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/40kmny/bitpays_adaptive_block_size_limit_is_my_favorite/
So, if the Chinese are willing to throw Bitcoin under the bus for their short-term profits (and Core / Blockstream currently helping them).. then maybe we should be willing to throw the Chinese miners under the bus now for the long-term success of Bitcoin.
And, regarding Core / Blockstream, I we're actually making good progress towards routing around their damage - because if coders don't give users the code they want, those coders eventually get left by the wayside - and this is starting to happen now.
We already have several repos, (Classic, BU, XT) all of which will add some form of "max blocksize" increase. I wouldn't be surprised if some of those repos might also decide to omit RBF.
The new Bitcoin repos can easily cherry-pick features from "Core" which they did and didn't like - and they're going to have to compete to gain users.
So "max blocksize" is definitely going to increase.
And RBF could be abandoned in the garbage heap of history, another curious bit of vandalism which gave Peter Todd another 15 minutes of fame and drama, and then the rest of the world moved on and got back to business.
And finally, regarding Theymos: he's gonna lose his power eventually. He's already lost a lot. Plus he's sloppy and careless and one of his screw-ups will eventually be his undoing.
In the meantime, remember that it's easy to route around him on Reddit, by using a multi:
https://np.reddit.com/Bitcoin+bitcoinxt+bitcoin_uncensored+btc/
submitted by ydtm to btc [link] [comments]

Transcript of George Webb Video Series Part 302 "Hillary's Leakers, Hackers, and Henchmen" [@Georgwebb / #HRCRatline]

  • Day 163.3. Old Guard vs New Guard at Tewksbury, MA - YouTube
    • Day 163 this is part 3
    • And it's too cold outside, so I have to do this inside
    • Here with Task Force, here with Deep Milwaukee
    • And we're just talking about this Frank enzyme Bradley right now
    • And we're trying to see if that's the same person that was in the global Intelligence files there WikiLeaks in 2012
    • And if people don't remember those leaks, they came out, and there are several embarrassing leaks about numerous companies around the world
    • Now, what I put forward to the group was that these were targets
    • These were Andrew McCabe type targets
    • The way infiltration works is you put your person in--kind of like Amy Dacey at Sony--you put your person in right below them, and then you come out with some thing about Amy Dacey telling--Obama jokes--that are off-color and get her fired
    • And then your person goes up, and then becomes a Sony director
    • That is Andrew McCabe's MO throughout his whole career
    • So that's why I say that's probably what he was doing with the Global Intelligence Files
    • I know it's an FBI operation because it was this guy named Sabu who was the handler, who was running around recruiting people to to hack the Global Intelligence files at Stratfor
    • Now, that's the deniability: they're not really hacking, but they say if they get caught oh it's that 20 year old guy that got--recruited by that 30 year old guy, not this team of hackers
    • So having said that the Task Force did a lot of research on this on this Bradley guy
    • And this ENSYM company that's mentioned prominently
    • Now, it's it's not enzyme with a Z it's enzyme turn the Z around to an S
    • And I think its SYMA
    • TF: YMA
    • I think it's actually [ENSYMA (ENSYMA ENGINEERING)] yeah
    • Now, give me some of the background on this guy he's he's a graduate at George Washington
    • TF: yeah master's degree George Washington in public administration
    • G: Well his business is in he worked for CERN
    • TF: a DoD gun license in Texas
    • G: He said he worked for a secret Intelligence agency
    • TF: Yes Secret Government company
    • And I'm gonna guess that's gonna be like a DynCorp or Leidos or Conceras or something like that
    • TF: And he said that he was working on viruses--admitted to that, but he will not go into the details of that
    • G: And his wife has a company called Global Logistics
    • So is she running stuff all around the world to CERN, like Californium, as well as bioweapons?
    • It's kind of although the whole ratline thing that we've been talking about through the whole series, potentially
    • TF: Right, [google redacted] AND HIS WIFE WAS A PART OF THE AIR FORCE NATIONAL GUARD AND SHE HAS A LOGISTICAL BACKGROUND, [/google redacted] she has a degree from Harvard, she does a lot of it a lot of Education behind her, a lot of different companies that she's involved in, a lot of logistics, it's kind of similar stuff that we've seen many many times
    • G: Throughout the whole seriously
    • So--this and the reason why I say Tewksbury, Massachusetts it could be that that's a wink
    • If you have this new guard an old guard--the whole War of the Roses in England was new guarda nd old guard
    • Richard the third, I always think of as Dick Cheney, you know, "Now, as winter of our discontent, made ready by the summer of York"
    • If that's the old guard, if Cheney--Bush all those guys Rumsfeld, and then on the left side Podesta and Manafort etc are the old guard,
    • The new guard could be--Pompeo, Mattis, Dunford, potentially Kelly, potentially the DIA guys like Flynn and Tony Shaffer are the new guard
    • If you wanted to really embarrass the old guard, and say, "hey we know your tricks. By the way, this guy was an expert (or not an expert)...But he was carrying around a lot of Blackberry enterprise servers as well as BlackBerries. Is he the replacement for Imran Awan, for secure encrypted communications?"
    • Again, anytime I see that it's kind of like, "well why do you have a burner phone--why do you have 18 burner phones in your backseat?", sir? --That kind of thing
    • It's kind of another signature, that says, "hey this person could be involved in illegal activity"
    • The best way for the old guard to catch the new guard to embarrass the old guard is to catch them in a city about ready to do something--
    • The Boston Marathon is coming up on the 17th in Boston: is this another repeat of the Boston Marathon?
    • Remember Graham Fuller yeah I did the Gladio plan Gladio B, now, is this Gladio C
    • Again, the Clockwork Orange thing--let's let's make a lot of terrorist incidents to get funding and keep our power--is that what's happening?
    • And the fact it's in Tewksbury was one of the key battles of that War of the Roses, where the new guard won and made our current Queen
    • So any last thoughts on?
    • TF: the only other thought was he called the police saying that he thought someone was breaking into his room at the hotel--they had guns in this hotel, which makes absolutely no sense to me if you have a--a storage full of AR-15s and weapons and gas masks and stuff like that, you call the police on yourself
    • TF: Especially if you're part of some secret Government program
    • G: Unless the new guard was trying to embarrass you
    • TF: Right, or the new guard made the call
    • G: the new guard made the call that was embarrassing you
    • {{ 911: just an observation: Maybe Agent Pettiworth et al thought YOU and Jason were part of the new guard and not just concerned citizens? }}
    • {{ 911: youtube is very incapable of transcribing TF, its annoying as f }}
    • TF: They said [that/not?] for the police to go into the house. It was coming out in the paper is that he made the phone call and that seems kind of ridiculous to me. Maybe the new guard made the phone call
    • G: Unless he had a remote camera, where he could see people going in to
    • TF: even then he would go back himself. I mean you wouldn't call the local cops
    • G: Right. So it looks like maybe that may be Andy's coming in to cover for him or something
    • But it looks like it we could have averted something happening
    • I think of Claude D'estre every time I think of the Boston Marathon
    • And [thinking] "Claude you would look at awful lot like that guy who was six feet away from the bomb, and is this another Colorado CIA School of Mines operation?"
    • So we'll see we'll see what happens
    • But I think people are going to connect the dots on this one
    • And certainly there's a very active Q, would you say Deep Milwaukee?
    • There's a an active Q discussion on this right now?
    • DM: Not Q but the anons
    • G: Ok not Q but the Anons
    • So there you have it
  • Day 164.4. SAIC’s Sam Visner Did NSA, MdA, and MITRE - YouTube
    • It's day 164 part 4
    • So here is where I met Deep Florida, this boarding officer for the Coast Guard the other night
    • He kind of confirmed the things that we had said about maritime data awareness packages
    • And how that they could call off interdiction people like The Stzroks family in Corpus Christi, or The Strokes family in San Diego can say at the Coast Guard level uh-uh from DIA can send a message down saying
    • No interdiction guide that boat to the target or I could bring a yacht into Port of Miami or port of Jacksonville or Port of Tampa or all the way up and down the coast--Charleston, South Carolina, Virginia Beach, all the Navy ports all the way up to where Joe Crowley is with his Wackenhut boat
    • So that's good
    • I want to talk to Deep Florida again, and we probably need to talk to him more, because that's real on the line, on the front lines Intelligence, where he was--seeing these same drug dealers over and over and over again at the 24 mile marker, and the nautical mile marker
    • The other thing about the first story we did today which was Bill Binney
    • It kind of dovetailed into that because SAIC, is the one who wrote the maritime data awareness package for all this
    • SAIC is also the company that wrote trailblazer, the program that took the place of thinthread--Bill Benny's thinthread
    • And the guy who bought it is a guy by the name of well there was one guy by the name of Ben Black, who was SAIC
    • And then he hired a guy named Sam VISNER who was also SAIC
    • So a lot of these NSA guys end up being SAIC guys
    • And that's the revolving door as far as the Navy's concerned
    • And you might have seen us cover that when we went up to Laurel racetrack
    • We talked to all the SAIC guys ex-Admirals who were--parlaying their horses around the Laurel Park
    • The second story we did today on Frank Bradley, Frank enzyme Bradley, was also interesting because he's in these global Intelligence files of the WikiLeaks
    • And I looked at the files there's 29 of them
    • And they're mostly spreadsheets
    • And there's it's kind of the same kind of audit coded spreadsheet
    • It goes from 2004 to 2011 there's 29 spreadsheets
    • And his emails in there
    • And it's for like 1995 a month
    • And there's all these Army guys
    • So that unlike--Bill Binney, and the Navy, and SAIC, and NSA
    • This was the second story we did today which is Frank enzyme Bradley, with the Bradley Fighting Vehicle right, turns out its Army--is that a fake name, because he's Army
    • And he's dispersing Army--gas masks and flashbang grenades and all sorts of things to JTTF units all over the country to these dog teams that that we've got?
    • Who knows--we don't know that
    • But it is interesting he is in this kind of list
    • And does that list get compromised in 2011?
    • ...And that's why the Fusion GPS is created?
    • Still, we don't know the answer to that either
    • But meeting you had another whistleblower here, so we're gonna stay in Milwaukee a little bit longer
  • Day 164.6 Meet Leah Vukmir - Next Senator From Wisconsin - YouTube
    • It's day 164 I think this is six
    • So we met the Senate candidate here that's going up against Tammy Baldwin
    • I wanted to--make a political statement, helping Paul Nealon against Paul Ryan here
    • Now, he lost by 50 points
    • So--Paul Ryan's gonna win
    • But it's probably more important that Leah Vukmir win as the candidate in the Senate seat, because the weight Wisconsin's organized is they have one Republican Senator and they have one Democratic Senator
    • Ron Johnson, as you probably know as the Republican Senator, he's in the Intelligence Committee...and been a good supporter of transparency
    • And then there of course is Johnson Wax in Milwaukee
    • And then there's Johnson Controls in Milwaukee the--the building controls
    • And then there's also Johnson & Johnson and Racine
    • So there's a lot of Johnson's going on here--I'm gonna stay away from that {{LOL}}
    • But Tammy Baldwin the Democrat is coming up for reelection
    • And the III I talked to her quite a bit
    • Leah is a very nice person, and she gave me about a half an hour of her time
    • And what I like about her she's a nurse
    • So she's got--she's just a nurse who wants to do the right thing
    • But she's very involved with manufacturing
    • And very involved with the police unions, the fire unions, the emergency services, all the people that are first responders
    • So I really wanted to give a strong statement of support
    • And again, a candidate that comes out says "hey I saw you, I want to come out, I want to meet you I want to introduce myself"
    • And I think these are the important people
    • She said I wasn't on the Trump train at first--she's a big Scott Walker person
    • She was part of that whole kind of hey you can't hold the--Government and the people, SEIU, you can't hold everybody hostage
    • But she said hey as as I got to know Trump better I got on the Trump train, and I'm a really strong Trump supporter
    • Again, I think Trump of I sat with all slew of of Trump supporters
    • Democrat and Republican tonight
    • And the key thing I keep hearing is: he's a businessman. He wants to bring jobs back to Wisconsin, and Michigan, and Ohio, I'm from Ohio--Indiana, I'm from Indiana
    • I want they want to bring jobs back I don't care if it's Mugwump or whatever, your party is, Trump wants to bring jobs back
    • So I want to support her I want to tweet her out
    • Again, it's Leah VUKMIR V U K M I R
    • And I think it's just a strong candidate
    • I think it's it's a person who it didn't necessarily doesn't have Paul Neilins background in manufacturing
    • But she know she's making an active effort--she's been in 66 of the 72 counties
    • And I just wanted to make a strong statement, because I just believe that she comes out, everyone I introduced her to tonight she's listened to and interacted with and listened
    • And as is kind of a person of the people
    • So I don't normally do political things
    • But this is a candidate I felt very strongly about, and her platform
    • And she needs to of course when the primary--it's a late primary here in Wisconsin--it's an April primary
    • So it's important that we do a lot of meet and greets
    • And a lot of fundraisers early to make sure that these kind of candidates get a chance to win in November against a kind of a very globalist
    • And I hate the word 'globalist'
    • I like the word 'carpetbagger' -- I've seen the destruction of towns in my hometown in Fort Wayne Indiana International Harvester plant left when I was in--teenager
    • And I've seen the destruction in Ohio, firsthand
    • And I've seen the destruction in Michigan
    • So I'm not as familiar with Wisconsin
    • But--you got Harley Davison
    • And we had this trade discussion--let's just take all the names
    • And brand names out of it
    • If it was Brand X over here
    • And that's your trade representative
    • And brand Y over there take China out of it take take the U.S. out of it
    • If your guy came back, and said hey I got a great deal we pay 35% tariff over there
    • And we get 1.2 percent tariff on their stuff coming--isn't that a great deal?
    • Everyone would say you're no longer our trade representative--get out
    • That's what we have right now,
    • And I think it's a hundred percent tariff on harley-davidson products in in Japan
    • And at least to 35% in China--I'd like to check those facts
    • So anyway lots of trade discussions
    • I know everybody's watching Final Four, but I just wanted to throw that out that we have a US Senate can adhere tonight that came out to me, and she wanted to tell her story, so there you have it
  • Day 165.1. The Good America - Binney, Wormwood - Olson Part 1 - YouTube
    • It's day 165
    • And this is part one Happy Easter everyone
    • Still bloody cold here somebody from Tewksbury--Gloucester, actually--about five miles from Tewksbury
    • Said they reenact the Battle of Tewkesbury every year
    • So I thought that was interesting
    • So maybe we'll reenact the old guard and the new guard with the Tony Schaefer and the Cyber Command boys
    • I expect Tony Schaefer to be getting a position with the Trump administration here pretty quickly in the Intelligence area
    • And maybe these Army guys--these Army Intel guys will push through a split with NSA and the Navy Intel guys
    • So we'll have a check on the Navy Intel boys
    • So anyway that's Tewksbury
    • So that's this battle reenactment they have in Tewksbury, where this guy was caught with these enzymes Frank enzyme Bradley
    • Riding around and his Bradley Fighting Vehicle throwing out bill swing enzymes on the population flu and flu viruses on the population it
    • Was he doing that? Who knows
    • But we can go look to Tewksbury now, every year to reenact our battle between this Navy
    • And Intel Command
    • And these new Army cyber boys that's that battle is developing one two great documentaries out
    • And it almost tells our story in terms of what a format of this story might look like
    • One is the "Good American", which tells a Bill Binney story about how he had Thinthread how this guy named a SAM Visner came in said oh my gosh this is great we're gonna do trailblazer instead collected all
    • Then when 9/11 happens, Sam Visner is the guy who says, "this is a cow we can milk for 15 years at SAIC"
    • So he leaves NSA, the Sam Visner, and goes to SAIC
    • And these are direct quotes--that this is the--opportunity of a lifetime
    • That same Sam visitor is in this Q discussion now, with this MITRE group in this this Highland Forum in this kind of public-private, pay-to-play partnerships
    • So, interesting to follow these things "full flight of the arrow" as I call that, all the way from 9/11 pre 9/11 all the way till now,
    • Sam Visner still doing--and SAIC--does the maritime data awareness program, said that ZIPZORP was talking about SAIC
    • SAIC formulates themselves with a new name called LEIDOS it's kind of a shuffle giving us a little "lead" LEIDOS shuffle--it's still SAIC, psst STILL SAIC
    • So a little Leidos shuffle there
    • So anyway the good American talks about how 9/11 could have been avoided with Bill Benny's Thinthread
    • And a lot of the folks I've talked to Diane Roark at length
    • I've talked to Curt Wiebe
    • And interacted with him on Twitter talked with Bill Binney
    • So a lot of the people in the series I recognized
    • And I've never never talked to a Thomas Drake, though, Tom Drake
    • But I would like to
    • But I think it's a great series to watch for the first part of our series, before the Awans got involved which is surveillance
    • And the misuse of surveillance
    • And maybe the Awan's are a part of that too, because you use a third-party Intelligence service like PAC ISI to have deniability on surveillance
    • But then there's a second part, which is not just surveillance, but now disruption we're actually gonna go out and try to make you--your life miserable
    • And that's really the second documentary
    • And it's a six-part 40-minute a shot documentary called Wormwood
    • But it is the dirty tricks part of the CIA, getting rid of you once you become a problem, once you start saying hey this isn't good
    • And we're using these truth serums and scopolamine to do--parties it--late at night in Montreal with--our good doctor up there, Dr. Gottlieb, where we did a series at the <
  • Day 165.2. Wormwood Part 2 - Bill Swing’s Ft Derrick - YouTube
    • This is part 2 of day 165
    • And this is following up on wormwood
    • Great movie, because it it's kind of also William Kobe versus Sy Hersh in terms of getting the story about out about Frank Frank Olson
    • This guy who was worked at MKULTRA, Sidney Gottlieb, at the McGill University in Montreal where we were in this series
    • So a lot of the places
    • And things that we've mentioned the series Fort Detrick and the bio weapons program in Maryland...are you go around to these different places and it connects all the dots in a long format, which is really nice
    • And here's Sy Hersh at the end saying, "hey this story's too big for me"
    • And we're we heard that before I feel like he was just recording our ending, and just said well let's just slap it on the end of this documentary
    • But anyway you'll see Sy Hersh say this is story's too big for me at the end, in that in that story
    • But this guy Frank Enzyme Bradley--being caught: was that just so they could double down the amount of spending on the Boston Marathon on the 17th?
    • So was that kind of an inside job the old guard kind of their little clockwork orange' Games?
    • Fear
    • Or was it the new guard was it kind of the new US Cyber Command--kids was with with Flynn and Tony Shafer who I expect to be named to position Intelligence position with Trump here pretty quick?
    • Was it this new split?
    • This new separation of powers were gonna have between the Army guys--the US Cyber Command, and the Navy guys that the NSA?
    • Who knows? We'll see what happens
    • But it was interesting tie into this guy who was at the CDC, who went disappearing
    • Is that why all these flu viruses are being disseminated in these different places?
    • Who knows
    • And also we have the NRA event coming up in March May 3rd 4th and 5th
    • Did Krylova and Bogacheva go to that before? Yes of course they did
    • That was in Dallas this year
    • But where was it before?
    • Where where was Ted Cruz? Where with all those events?
    • We still don't know--none of that's come out
    • And one of the other things I've noticed about the Q phenomenon is I much I have a much greater understanding of how unknowns with Q and being on boards
    • And talking with all these people last night that follow Q
    • And the creation of these memes
    • And I think that's something that our series needs to do is create memes from the series
    • And so I'm gonna continue to create these playlists
    • So that people can go through
    • And say here's all the Navy Intel--from beginning to end in the whole series
    • And then create a Navy Intel meme with the old ones because I think the ones are extension of Navy Intel
    • And then do the same thing for the other significant memes in the in the series
    • So even though Q took a lot of my viewers away
    • And a lot of my researchers away, in a way it's good, because they show you a more effective way of doing open sourcing, creating these memes...
    • So I look forward to a good day of reporting
    • We won't say where all the places we're going, but have a happy easter everyone
  • Day 165.3. Preview of Andre Taggart Reveal - NNSA - YouTube
    • OK It's day 165 and this is part three
    • And this is sort of a sneak peak to the solution to the whole series
    • And I've said before we're kind of going from a pay-to-play world where things were doing below the table
    • And I the three initials there are MBZ the crown prince of Abu Dhabi
    • And sort of Hillary Clinton moving into the Trump world which is MBS, which is above the board--crown prince of Saudi Arabia or just do everything aboveboard
    • And the people who are doing the below the board business are pissed
    • So this series really has been looking at how that below the board business was done
    • So collecting metadata on how that was done--David Petraeus--the create the creation of this rogue NSA which is NNSA
    • Which is Not so Nice NSA
    • Basically created a Uranium cover for the last 20 years
    • And everything basically below that was this weapons for drugs or weapons for minerals or weapons for human resources kind of business
    • And that's the story of the last 20 years in Hillary Clinton and the whole crew,
    • And Navy Intel and her kind of unholy creation of this alliance with with NCIS or or this just rotten core inside a Navy Intel
    • So I just created a list about Navy Intel if you want to review the Navy Intel list if you haven't been following this series
    • But basically you have to find the server: where are they doing this?
    • You have to physically find it
    • So we go to Washington DC we we find--we collect a lot of metadata
    • We find the Lorton address where all this business is being conducted
    • Now, I do I think that's the real address?
    • No, that's the parallel construction if they ever get caught
    • They say there's deniability--it's just a just a group of people that are doing--find a bank fraud there's a small deal--it's not a big deal
    • The real action is at the Navy Yard
    • And that building 213 an old DIA building which was called a Threat Analysis Center
    • And this we've said this in the series for almost a year
    • So this isn't any surprise to anyone
    • The part I'm gonna let out today is I knew Taggart was a fake from the beginning
    • And I knew Tane Taggart was a fake from the beginning
    • I knew that I mean they weren't--just renting the property
    • But there was a reason why I had to go with that deception, because you let people who are in the business
    • (And they're just doing their jobs, right?)
    • You let people who are doing the business let the let the charade play out let the school play play out because you get valuable data although all along the way
    • I had to make Taggart the hero in order so other people would come forward and so he would continue talking
    • That was the key part
    • Keep giving us more metadata
    • It's too bad we couldn't have had a couple of more interviews with Taggart a couple of more interviews with Laurel Everly
    • All the people that are kind of either knowingly or unknowingly involved
    • An Tane Taggart would have been a good interview
    • Jacquayla would have been a good interview
    • But that's fine we still solve a puzzle now
    • Which is basically the drives were the takeaways for going to Pakistan--that those were the real drives--the ones that went in March, not the ones that were the decoys in April, that were left in the Rayburn office building
    • And that was the server's--that's how the trade occurred
    • It was on that caucus server--the drugs for weapons trade
    • The next thing was once got the servers--and the Sprayer home could have also been a place where people were were compromised
    • But then the next piece in in the whole thing is actually how do they do it?
    • And it was with these containers and
    • So we got down to the containers
    • And then how what goes into container?
    • So we really really got to a granular level with the cars--Alpha Jalloh ring to do all that
    • And everything else since that has been proving who with in Navy Intel have been the key people to put this whole thing together?
    • So I'll just leave it right there Taggarts a good guy
    • I think in Bethesda I remember I was in Bethesda, Maryland
    • And I almost said Taggarts role
    • And I held off, because I wanted to find out more about the people that were inside Navy Intel they we're actually running this
    • But I think you may know who who those people are already
    • But I'll just leave that for a more non XSTAR general logistics pay-sized version
  • Day 165.4. Saipov’s Mt Prospect Trucking - Near Blues Brothers Auto Auction - YouTube
    • It's day 165 here we are at beautiful Bussy Road
    • Go down to the end of this road on Bussy Road here in beautiful Mount Prospect
    • And you have the Mount Prospect auto auction of Blues Brothers Fame
    • Remember that Jake said we are on a mission from God
    • So the interesting thing about this is Saipov
    • Saipov truckers
    • They have a Saipov--the guy who ran down did the run down in Chelsea--ran over those five Argentinians
    • I think one of them was a nuclear scientist
    • The other one was that woman from Belgium the Belle from Belgium
    • We also have though sighs I've had a trucking company in Cincinnati trucking company
    • And car company in Cleveland car company here in Mount Prospect, Illinois close to Rahm Emanuel, close to Schneider, we're jan Schakowsky's district now
    • And of course one in Tampa
    • So the key here is chain migration and lottery: not such a good plan
    • The Saipov truckers? Not such a good plan
    • The Uzbekis--drugs going one way, weapons going the other, Uranium cover: not such a good idea
  • Day 166.1 Naugty NSA School Play Falling Apart - YouTube
    • It's day 166 part 1
    • And yesterday I revealed Andre Taggart is sort of a player in a Shakespearean play, if you will, covering the Awans, and the state support of the Awans spy ring in Congress, as well as Awan-Contra: the trading scheme for weapons and drugs in the Congress
    • Did they also have a sex ring in Congress, with all of the Awans beatings?
    • Well that's for another day
    • But certainly Taggart would have nothing to do with that
    • But the I am dubbing NNSA or the naught NSA as the key conspirator behind this, in much the same way we can say the revolt from the West at Tewkesbury 500 years ago was led by Richard the 3rd, I'm pinning this on Andrew McCabe, Hillary Clinton, and the NNSA
    • This is going to be a kind of a as we've said before kind of a power elite move
    • Its gonna be SAIC, key contractors like Lockheed, Northrop Grumman, doing major projects like Trailblazer at NSA Bill Binney Fame versus Thinthread, as well as Maritime Data Awareness applications like the application we singled out which was the Pandas, which which lines up well with Seth Rich in the Congress
    • You don't remember yesterday or the symbol first of all for NNSA
    • Here's I dubbed this this morning about four hours ago
    • And I talked about the different contractors involved in the NNSA
    • Now, I also created a playlist
    • So if you're not familiar with all the eleven or twelve different videos I've done on NSA
    • But the key here is Uranium under color-of-law with Uranium, now, I can trade anything below
    • And it provides me kind of the same sort of drayage that it provided the British Navy
    • Don't tell me what's of below decks just tell me how much it weighs and give me my commission for transporting it
    • And I do believe that Navy Jack has kind of I'm not going to say manipulated Crowdsource the Truth
    • But I do believe it has been sort of an information operation since the beginning to put the lid on this NNSA activity
    • I think the folks there knew that this would eventually come out if the crowd dug in on it
    • And there's been all kinds of diversionary tactics
    • But I think yesterday, Navy Jack threw the towel in
    • And now, he's trying to do anonymous strikes
    • So I won't say who Navy jack is specifically, but there are a few Navy Jack's out there
    • And specifically I think what they want to bury as this Andre Taggart interview in this Laurel Everly interview
    • Because it flies directly in the face it flies directly in the face of the truth and
    • But they give away key facts that unravel this whole NNSA pay-to-play scheme
    • I think also all of the anywhere you see those routers that at the Sprayer house that Jason filmed are going to be important as well
    • So I do believe the NNSA is trying to shut it down
    • Whether that's a Navy Jack or not we don't know for sure
    • But here's another article that came out that said, "oh by the way we all signed a slip a paper that advocated our rights of checking out and vetting The Awans in this scheme"
    • It's obvious that once a spy ringin Congress and also arms for drugs trading ring in Congress has state support and
    • So after the fact these 44 different Democrats are gonna say, "oh, but there was a piece of paper that we could sign that have been abdicated all our responsibilities in terms of vetting, because Debbie Wasserman-Schultz said so"
    • And I think we're hot on the trail of all the pieces of this network
    • They brought in these Uzbeki truckers to ship this stuff around here in Chicago--where I am in Mount prospect--was just one of the many trucking companies two in Ohio, one in New Jersey, in Paterson, New Jersey; one in Tampa, Florida as you can see here
    • So eventually with research this will all come to light
    • And that's why I think they want NNSA wants to bury these buried these films of Andre Taggart
    • So that's where we are today
    • I just want to say that I think we're hot on the trail
    • The metadata leads me to believe more than ever that we will put the pieces of the puzzle together even if we don't get certain documents from the court
  • Rosemont Casino - Bring Out Your Hawala and Your Dead - YouTube
    • Beautiful day 166 this is part two here at the Rosemont casino
    • And I just want to show you if you just recently had a sniper incident where an unfortunate person died at your hands you could bring the body here
    • And I'll show you how far you have to go to turn the body in to get five thousand dollars in chips here at the Rosemont casino
    • And I'm not kidding
    • If you look up Bioresource Center
    • And this is a show we did a long time ago I think it might have been over a year ago
    • We talked about there was prisoners at Holman square down south of Chicago down by the United Center where the Bulls used to play
    • That was a key place for bringing in--just as Christopher Steele does liaison operations, Intelligence operations in the United States for the FBI, we do liaison operations for other countries here in the United States for them
    • So we torture prisoners here for other countries
    • Again, that eludes their rules about informing their oversight bodies about operations
    • So if you don't remember what a liaison operation was: it's a way of avoiding the reporting that's in our Constitution about talking to the gang of eight, which is four people from the Congress on the Senate side, four people in the Congress on the on the side of the Senate
    • Two Senators from each party, two Congressmen from each party
    • But literally right there village of Rosemont is where BioResource Recovery Center was
    • Now, I'd only have to walk a little bit further down under that bridge to actually go to the USDA facility
    • Now, the USDA facility--if you recall--is where what we had right next to our our Gülen schools
    • I can't remember--they usually give a a name like Wisdom schools or Affinity schools or--Great Clocks by Kids Schools--they give them some kind of lofty name which is fine
    • But if you remember my visit there we basically had a lot of great teachers
    • So that they can farm the money through, and launder the money through
    • It's always great it's like a union you can always farm the money through gangsters love unions lots of workers lots of paychecks
    • But then you have one guy who can sue who's an English teacher from Turkey or some country like that: usually Turkey
    • And he is the interpreter
    • And then you got one guy in the back that cannot speak a word of English
    • And I call him the Halal money changer
    • So right behind me is O'Hare Airport
    • And literally all day he does is just count out Halal
    • Now, what comes into this you a facility here?
    • Well fruits and vegetables and also meat perishables things that could carry insects etc or food borne viruses
    • So they need to be irradiated
    • They need to make a trip to Ames, Iowa
    • So if you don't remember that part of our trip, you can go back and look at that
    • USDA
    • Now, I did
    • (I hope I don't get a copyright strike on the parking lot music)
    • I did interview a USDA person, and it turns out they loan a lot of money now to women farmers and also minority farmers
    • They want to get women started in farming and minority farmers
    • This turns out to be extremely difficult to get an American a loan
    • But very simple if you're from a different country
    • I know that's gonna us I know how hard that is gonna be for people to believe
    • Again, ninety nine point five percent of the people in USDA doing a great job
    • I only need to compromise 0.5%
  • Day 166.3. Delivering Imran’s Bitcoin To Rahm From O’Hare - YouTube
    • Day 166 part 3
    • I've now, made it from the airport with all the Halal cash
    • And the hawala you can see the armored car here I'm bout ready to take it in to Rahm Emanuel here at City Hall behind me
    • But before I do that because it's all Bitcoin now, it's all on hard drives, it's all on Imran's hard drive
    • So there's literally terabytes worth of Bitcoin
    • So makes it easier than the old days where you needed a big Brinks truck I still like to ride in the Brinks truck
    • But as you remember from the movie The Blues Brothers
    • You've got the Picasso here looks like it's a different color
    • Maybe this isn't the Picasso? Maybe--the I thought the Picasso was across the street from City Hall anyway
    • Well we'll go over there and find out if it's a Picasso or not
    • Maybe they replaced the Picasso
    • This is the scene where all the police cars pile up the Chicago police cars the Chicago's finest over there as you can see I do believe this is Richard Mary Daly square if it's not that I've just made a mistake
    • But as you can see now, all I need is hard drives to take Bitcoin to Pakistan
    • And I'm saying that probably happened on the 7th of March
    • And I picked up where I found the decoy about a month later with Andre Taggart
    • And now, of course I've exposed Taggart, because I see them shutting down the channel
    • I see I think there's foul play--in the runs--rotten in the state of Denmark, something rotten in the state of Denmark as Hamlet would say
    • So if that isn't Picasso then I don't know what is
    • But I do think there's something rotten in the state of Denmark
    • And they're shutting down Jason's channel we have to get all those interviews
    • And phone calls from Taggart before they go away as--44 different Democrats, maybe up to 50 waved, doing a background check on Imran Awan
    • And all the conspirators Lisa Maria Bartiromo says it's the biggest story of the year that's not been covered
    • The biggest uncover story of the year the story is breaking now and you're live to see it here in Chicago
    • And just I want to say hi to Rahm
    • Bole di Juggies is doing great, Rahm
    • I got all the Bitcoin: we got it all!
    • We got it all baby, nobody stopped us: Andy didn't stop us at the airport: we got it all
submitted by 911bodysnatchers322 to TruthLeaks [link] [comments]

Peter Rizun - Empirical Double spend Probabilities for Unconfirmed Transactions Bitcoin Exploit. Double Spend Attack! Who's At Risk?? BTC Volatility Index. Waves & Enigma Web 3.0 Bitcoin Double Spender Hack Bitcoin Tutorial #8 - Das Double Spend Problem Bitcoin: This is how Bitcoin Solved the Double-Spending Problem  Planet Crypto (Hindi/Urdu)

Blockchain News, Opinion, TV and Jobs – Bitcoin. Cryptograph has gone live with their new auction platform this week featuring original digital artwork by Crypto world leaders such as Vitalik Buterin, Vlad Zamfir,... If a hacker can trick a person into believing they received payment, while simultaneously maintaining control of the bitcoin, this is a double-spend, according to ZenGo’s researchers. Others ... Malicious cryptocurrency miners took control of Bitcoin BTC Gold‘s blockchain recently to double-spend $72,000 worth of BTG.. Bad actors assumed a majority of the network‘s processing power ... Hacker News new past comments ask show jobs submit: login: Bitcoin Gold Hit by Double Spend Attack, Exchanges Lose Millions (ccn.com) 973 points by drexlspivey on May 23, 2018 hide past web favorite 531 comments: jhpriestley on May 23, 2018. When Bitcoin was running up to $20,000, I tried to analyze the system and come to a personal conclusion about its equilibrium value ... After reorganizing the Ethereum blockchain, the attackers were able to what's called "double spend" about 219,500 ETC by recovering previously spent coins from the rightful recipients and transferring them to new entities chosen by attackers (typically a wallet in their control).

[index] [2252] [22469] [144] [40497] [2120] [24870] [5656] [32184] [21357] [37367]

Peter Rizun - Empirical Double spend Probabilities for Unconfirmed Transactions

One of the points that makes Bitcoin so special is that it solved the double-spending problem. This is something no one in the world was able to do prior to Satoshi Nakamoto's concept of ... Peter Rizun - Empirical Double spend Probabilities for Unconfirmed Transactions Presented 16 October 2018 at Satoshi's Vision Instant Transactions Workshop Gargnano (Lake Garda) Italy https ... Bitcoin ATM’s have recently been targeted in Canada, and thieves made away with $200,000 in cash because of a double spend exploit. The Bitcoin core code has a replace by fee tool which allows a ... Live Bitcoin Trading With DeriBot on Deribit DeriBot Backup 141 watching Live now How To Double Spend Your Stuck Bitcoin Transaction with FSS-RBF - Duration: 8:22. Bitcoin Double-Spend Tool Now Available to All: Interview w/ Glass Hunt's Hackers - Duration: 9:11. Dash - Digital Cash 14,832 views

#